2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-14364-4_26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Personalized Modeling of Facial Action Unit Intensity

Abstract: Abstract. Facial expressions depend greatly on facial morphology and expressiveness of the observed person. Recent studies have shown great improvement of the personalized over non-personalized models in variety of facial expression related tasks, such as face and emotion recognition. However, in the context of facial action unit (AU) intensity estimation, personalized modeling has been scarcely investigated. In this paper, we propose a two-step approach for personalized modeling of facial AU intensity from sp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead, it seeks a personalized classifier by re-weighting training samples according to their distribution mismatch with test samples. Several studies merged into this direction could be found in [55], [78]–[80]. …”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, it seeks a personalized classifier by re-weighting training samples according to their distribution mismatch with test samples. Several studies merged into this direction could be found in [55], [78]–[80]. …”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, SIFT and HOG) have been widely used for AU detection, yet are susceptible to person-specific biases ( e.g. , [4, 5, 6]). To be successful, representations must generalize to unseen subjects, regardless of individual differences caused by behavior, facial morphology and recording environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To learn a generalizable representation, a CNN is trained to extract spatial features. As analyzed in this study, such features reduce person-specific biases that were identified in hand-crafted features [3,27,38], and thus offer possibilities to reduce the burden of designing sophisticated classifiers. To capture temporal dependencies, LSTMs are stacked on top of the spatial features.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%