2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2020.103606
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning multimorbidity patterns from electronic health records using Non-negative Matrix Factorisation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The key clustering approaches used in the reviewed studies included agglomerative 24 , 31 and divisive 32 hierarchical clustering, 28 latent class analysis, 29 , 33 and graph theory, 34 all of which require substantially large health data sets. Moreover, novel machine learning approaches have been used to characterize and learn multimorbidity patterns, 35 , 36 but these methods are yet to be applied to T2DM specifically. Although the study approaches and settings were varied, predictors and predominant groups of conditions across clusters were identified and are discussed in the following sections.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The key clustering approaches used in the reviewed studies included agglomerative 24 , 31 and divisive 32 hierarchical clustering, 28 latent class analysis, 29 , 33 and graph theory, 34 all of which require substantially large health data sets. Moreover, novel machine learning approaches have been used to characterize and learn multimorbidity patterns, 35 , 36 but these methods are yet to be applied to T2DM specifically. Although the study approaches and settings were varied, predictors and predominant groups of conditions across clusters were identified and are discussed in the following sections.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One limitation imposed by data size is that morbidity discovery is necessarily pairwise; hence the term comorbidity, as opposed to multimorbidity discovery. Tools for multimorbidity-based discovery 43 are necessarily limited in scale due to computational constraints, considering for instance, 34 disease clusters 44 . In contrast, we have calculated pairwise comorbidities among 37,997 ICD10 diagnosis codes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the study of Hassaine et al, it was shown, using the matrix factorization method, how disease clusters progress over time, forming multimorbidity networks. An interpretation of the results is questionable, as the real clinical utility is not easy to see [107].…”
Section: The Ways To Improve Implementation Of Machine Learning/big Dmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The presentation of temporal dynamics of multiple interactions inherent to multimorbidity is a special challenge for data scientists as it requires more sophisticated algorithms and a multi-step analytics, that go beyond a case-control classification and the use of linear regression analysis to show its progression over time [105][106][107]. The study designs for learning about temporal dynamics of this complexity are still poorly developed and are maintained within the framework of unsupervised learning (an outcome is not known) and disease-disease relationships [31,107]. Although data scientists have an absolute authority in building these sophisticated data analytics, without incorporation of domain knowledge in creation of the research task and evaluation of the interpretability of the performed analytics, the real-life usability of these innovations will be questionable [104].…”
Section: New Approaches In Multimorbidity Research Associated With Pamentioning
confidence: 99%