2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10514-016-9571-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning modular and transferable forward models of the motions of push manipulated objects

Abstract: The ability to predict how objects behave during manipulation is an important problem. Models informed by mechanics are powerful, but are hard to tune. An alternative is to learn a model of the object's motion from data, to learn to predict. We study this for push manipulation. The paper starts by formulating a quasi-static prediction problem. We then pose the problem of learning to predict in two different frameworks: (i) regression and (ii) density estimation. Our architecture is modular: many simple, object… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, they formulated the problem as regression and subsequently as density estimation. In Kopicki et al (2017) they extended this work further. Their architecture is modular in that multiple object-and context-specific forward models are learned which represent different constraints on the object's motion.…”
Section: Metrically Precise Modelsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, they formulated the problem as regression and subsequently as density estimation. In Kopicki et al (2017) they extended this work further. Their architecture is modular in that multiple object-and context-specific forward models are learned which represent different constraints on the object's motion.…”
Section: Metrically Precise Modelsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In contrast, metrically precise models have investigated how to learn a mapping between actions and its effects, e.g. (Kopicki et al, 2017). A second more recent strand is the application of deep learning techniques to learn a physical intuition of the mechanics of pushing from visual data, see Fragkiadaki et al (2015).…”
Section: Final Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even if this is solved, approximations used in rigid body engines can render poor predictions. An alternative is to learn a model from data [1], [11], [18], [26], or to use a hybrid approach [3], [32]. Learning methods divide into data-intensive and data-efficient methods.…”
Section: A Learning Models For Pushingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are also data-efficient approaches to learning push effects [2], [18], [19]. These models typically use hand-crafted features, and have not yet been used for push planning.…”
Section: A Learning Models For Pushingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Box pushing. When pushing an unknown object a robot needs to plan its motions and pushing actions while taking model [29], sensing, and actuation uncertainty into account. Therefore, we model the pushing task as a hybrid control continuous state POMDP.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%