CVPR 2011 2011
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2011.5995519
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning hierarchical poselets for human parsing

Abstract: We consider the problem of human parsing with partbased models. Most previous work in part-based models only considers rigid parts (e.g. torso, head, half

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
165
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(166 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(53 reference statements)
1
165
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notice also that using dense features leads to better results than using of STIP features. This should be related to the fact that the features of [25] include motion boundaries and velocities in addition to HOG and HOF. Finally, notice that the results from [1] are 2-12% better, but they assume known segmentation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Notice also that using dense features leads to better results than using of STIP features. This should be related to the fact that the features of [25] include motion boundaries and velocities in addition to HOG and HOF. Finally, notice that the results from [1] are 2-12% better, but they assume known segmentation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first one is a concatenation of histograms of oriented gradients (HOG) and histograms of optical flows (HOF) extracted from a cuboid centered around each STIP point [24]. Since STIP points tend to be sparse in space, we also use the dense features presented in [25], which consist of HOG, HOF, and histograms of motion boundaries and velocities (in term of x and y coordinates) computed around dense trajectories. CRF pairwise.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Performing exact inference on these models is typically intractable and approximate methods at learning and test time need to be used. Recent methods have also explored using part hierarchies [16,17] and condition the detection of smaller parts that model regions around anatomical joints on the localization of larger composite parts or poselets [11,10,18,19] that model limbs in canonical configurations and tend to be easier to detect.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the image domain, Random Forests have been introduced for human body pose classification [11]. Finally, the combination of holistic and part-based methods has been explored by introducing the concept of Poselets [27] in the pictorial structures framework [2,28]. These approaches have proposed an intermediate representation but they still do not capture the whole anatomy of the human body.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%