2021
DOI: 10.1080/02508060.2021.2006948
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning from the past to build the future governance of groundwater use in agriculture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Transformations to Sustainable Groundwater Systems Project has supported shared learning across case studies to look at grassroots initiatives in groundwater governance, including insights from ethnography and hydrogeology (Zwarteveen et al 2021). Processes of learning and discussion about improving groundwater governance may not only consider regulations, financial incentives, and other options for changing institutions but also more fundamentally reshape ideas about sharing identity and relationship to an aquifer, landscape, or territory, and the values and futures that could or should be pursued (Petit et al 2021) In devising ways to cope with new challenges, people often draw on and modify their existing knowledge and practices. This kind of improvisation, trying out different modifications and reworkings of existing institutions, has been described and analyzed as institutional bricolage (Cleaver 2012), tinkering (Zwarteveen et al 2021), or community experimentation (Saidani et al 2023).…”
Section: Multiple Perspectives On Governing Groundwatermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Transformations to Sustainable Groundwater Systems Project has supported shared learning across case studies to look at grassroots initiatives in groundwater governance, including insights from ethnography and hydrogeology (Zwarteveen et al 2021). Processes of learning and discussion about improving groundwater governance may not only consider regulations, financial incentives, and other options for changing institutions but also more fundamentally reshape ideas about sharing identity and relationship to an aquifer, landscape, or territory, and the values and futures that could or should be pursued (Petit et al 2021) In devising ways to cope with new challenges, people often draw on and modify their existing knowledge and practices. This kind of improvisation, trying out different modifications and reworkings of existing institutions, has been described and analyzed as institutional bricolage (Cleaver 2012), tinkering (Zwarteveen et al 2021), or community experimentation (Saidani et al 2023).…”
Section: Multiple Perspectives On Governing Groundwatermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there have been concerns about groundwater governance approaches and their success in supporting the ever-increasing use of the resource (Molle & Closas, 2020). As such, the past decade has seen mobilisation for action towards strengthened groundwater governance systems (Petit et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last decades, two perspectives have been adopted to address the control of groundwater overexploitation: State (regulatory, monitoring or economic) instruments to control abstraction, and participatory mechanisms involving stakeholders through different arrangements (Villholth et al, 2019;Petit et al, 2021). State action has focused on the implementation of a panoply of top-down strategies to control the number and extraction capacity of wells (Molle et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%