2001
DOI: 10.1207/s15516709cog2504_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning from human tutoring

Abstract: Human one-to-one tutoring has been shown to be a very effective form of instruction. Three contrasting hypotheses, a tutor-centered one, a student-centered one, and an interactive one could all potentially explain the effectiveness of tutoring. To test these hypotheses, analyses focused not only on the effectiveness of the tutors' moves, but also on the effectiveness of the students' construction on learning, as well as their interaction. The interaction hypothesis is further tested in the second study by mani… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

24
431
2
14

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 566 publications
(490 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
24
431
2
14
Order By: Relevance
“…These studies suggest that human tutoring is effective because the tutor provides a give and take, offering guidance when help is needed, but holding back enough to encourage autonomy. Multiple studies show that encountering obstacles and working through them can be an important step in the learning process (Chi M, Siler A., Jeong H., Yamauchi T., & Lavancher C, 2001;Ohlsson & Rees, 1991). However, there are potential drawbacks to this approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies suggest that human tutoring is effective because the tutor provides a give and take, offering guidance when help is needed, but holding back enough to encourage autonomy. Multiple studies show that encountering obstacles and working through them can be an important step in the learning process (Chi M, Siler A., Jeong H., Yamauchi T., & Lavancher C, 2001;Ohlsson & Rees, 1991). However, there are potential drawbacks to this approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The metaphor of scaffolding is derived from mother-child observations and has been applied to many other contexts, such as computer environments (Azevedo and Hadwin 2005;Cuevas et al 2002;Feyzi-Behnagh et al 2013;Rasku-Puttonen et al 2003;Simons and Klein 2007), tutoring settings (e.g., Chi et al 2001) and classroom settings (e.g., Mercer and Fisher 1992;Roll et al 2012). Scaffolding is closely related to the socio-cultural theory of Vygotsky (1978) and especially to the Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD).…”
Section: Scaffoldingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we examine learning correlations with both tutor and student dialogue acts, and we analyze learning correlations with both single occurrences and sequences of these dialogue acts. Our analyses of student dialogue act unigrams, tutor dialogue act unigrams, student-tutor dialogue act bigrams and tutor-student dialogue act bigrams represent our approach to exploring three main hypotheses in the literature regarding why one-on-one dialogue tutoring is so effective: a student-centered hypothesis, a tutor-centered hypothesis, and an interaction-centered hypothesis (Chi, Siler, Jeong, Yamauchi and Hausmann 2001). Our dialogue act analyses lend support for all three hypotheses: in our corpora, student learning is correlated with student dialogue acts, with tutor dialogue acts, and with bigrams containing both types of acts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%