2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/hri.2019.8673287
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning from Corrective Demonstrations

Abstract: Robots operating in real-world human environments will likely encounter task execution failures. To address this, we would like to allow co-present humans to refine the robot's task model as errors are encountered. Existing approaches to task model modification require reasoning over the entire dataset and model, limiting the rate of corrective updates. We introduce the State-Indexed Task Updates (SITU) algorithm to efficiently incorporate corrective demonstrations into an existing task model by iteratively ma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chernova & Thomaz (4) covered techniques for managing the interaction, such as active learning (39,(45)(46)(47)(48) and corrective demonstrations (49,50), in greater detail. Amershi et al (51) presented several case studies that illustrate the importance of studying the users of intelligent systems in order to improve both user experience and robot performance.…”
Section: Active and Interactive Demonstrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chernova & Thomaz (4) covered techniques for managing the interaction, such as active learning (39,(45)(46)(47)(48) and corrective demonstrations (49,50), in greater detail. Amershi et al (51) presented several case studies that illustrate the importance of studying the users of intelligent systems in order to improve both user experience and robot performance.…”
Section: Active and Interactive Demonstrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gutierrez et al (2018) present an incremental task modification algorithm based on a demonstration that creates and probabilistically selects corrections for structural modifications in a finite-state machine task model. Gutierrez et al (2019) build on this approach by providing a demonstration at or near execution failure so as to only having to locally update the model. The local update procedure determines if the demonstration represents a known primitive (as opposed to a new one), in which case the demonstration is added and the primitive retrained.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LfD by simply focused on learning a consistent performing policy from a few demonstrations of a simple task with a well-defined starting and goal configuration which often fails for achieving the complex tasks with a single policy. Therefore, learning to represent the complex tasks from unstructured demonstrations provided by sequential sub-tasks, or movement primitives that are associated with generalization, fault detection, fault diagnoses, and task exploration, which may be reusable in complex and multi-step tasks [15], [16]. For this reason, recent work has aimed at associating the multimodal signals and historical experiences the process of learning from demonstrations [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%