2023
DOI: 10.1101/2023.05.30.542796
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning dynamic image representations for self-supervised cell cycle annotation

Abstract: Time-based comparisons of single-cell trajectories are challenging due to their intrinsic heterogeneity, autonomous decisions, dynamic transitions and unequal lengths. In this paper, we present a self-supervised framework combining an image autoencoder with dynamic time series analysis of latent feature space to represent, compare and annotate cell cycle phases across single-cell trajectories. In our fully data-driven approach, we map similarities between heterogeneous cell tracks and generate statistical repr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While it is theoretically feasible to discern each embryonic stage ranging from a single nucleus to 558 nuclei at the conclusion of embryogenesis, such an undertaking would be exceedingly challenging for a high-throughput approach [38][39][40] or require staining of additional markers [41]. Therefore, we employ an autoencoder-based image classifier to learn representations from fixed, DAPI-stained C. elegans embryos to automatically stage them in an approach similar to [42]. We rely on a manually created training dataset for each developmental stage to achieve reliable predictions from the learned representations.…”
Section: Computational Staging Of C Elegans Embryos and Smfish Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While it is theoretically feasible to discern each embryonic stage ranging from a single nucleus to 558 nuclei at the conclusion of embryogenesis, such an undertaking would be exceedingly challenging for a high-throughput approach [38][39][40] or require staining of additional markers [41]. Therefore, we employ an autoencoder-based image classifier to learn representations from fixed, DAPI-stained C. elegans embryos to automatically stage them in an approach similar to [42]. We rely on a manually created training dataset for each developmental stage to achieve reliable predictions from the learned representations.…”
Section: Computational Staging Of C Elegans Embryos and Smfish Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[17][18][19] Scientists have also applied deep learning to microscopy images directly to predict single-cell phenotypes (reviewed in Pratapa et al 20 ), most often using convolutional neural networks 21 or autoencoders. 22 However, these approaches do not rigorously test the generalizability of single-cell phenotype prediction in new datasets. Other approaches have successfully mapped bulk signatures across datasets, but these primarily focus on linking perturbation signatures rather than individual single-cell phenotypes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%