2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfranklin.2017.05.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning control for linear systems under general data dropouts at both measurement and actuator sides: A Markov chain approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where two facts that šœ€ k (t) is independent with šœ‚ k (t) and xk|kāˆ’1 āŠ„x k|kāˆ’1 are used respectively. Substituting (24) into…”
Section: Input Filtering At the Actuator Sidementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where two facts that šœ€ k (t) is independent with šœ‚ k (t) and xk|kāˆ’1 āŠ„x k|kāˆ’1 are used respectively. Substituting (24) into…”
Section: Input Filtering At the Actuator Sidementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In References 22ā€24, authors researched the convergence performance of networked ILC systems with data dropouts in both sides. On the basis of Markov chain, some compensation methods were proposed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20,21 As to the latter, inspired by the work reported in Emelianova et al, 22 the input updating process with random dropouts was modeled as a Markov chain. [23][24][25] In addition, a variety of approaches were proposed for guaranteeing the convergence performance of networked ILC systems with random data dropouts, and can be split into two categories: Kalman-type filtering methods and compensation methods. In their studies, [26][27][28] Ahn et al filtered the effect of output data dropped dependently or not through selecting the learning gain adaptively.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As to the former, the value of variables was used to describe that corresponding data was dropped or not 20,21 . As to the latter, inspired by the work reported in Emelianova et al, 22 the input updating process with random dropouts was modeled as a Markov chain 23ā€“25 . In addition, a variety of approaches were proposed for guaranteeing the convergence performance of networked ILC systems with random data dropouts, and can be split into two categories: Kalmanā€type filtering methods and compensation methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies have been conducted on the resilience of ILC in the presence of data dropout and robustness issues. Upon review, it becomes apparent that most ILC techniques designed to address data dropout are exclusively applicable to linear systems [13][14][15][16][17] or affine nonlinear systems. [18][19][20][21][22][23] According to Bu et al 13,14 and Shen et al [15][16][17] separate ILC models are developed for linear systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%