Lean Thinking to manage a national working group on physics aspects of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy

Abstract

To report how the adoption of a Lean Thinking mindset in the management of a national working group (WG) on the physics of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) contributed to achieve SBRT standardization objectives. Methods: Vision for the WG has been established as fragmentation reduction and process harmonization enhancement in SBRT for Italian centers. Two main research themes of the technical aspects of SBRT emerged as areas with major standardization improvement needs, small field dosimetry and SBRT planning comparisons, to be investigated through multi-institutional studies. The management of the WG leveraged on the Lean concept of fostering self-organization in a non-hierarchical environment. Four progressive involvement levels were defined for each study. No specific "scientific" preexperience was required to propose and coordinate a project, just requiring a voluntary commitment. People engagement was measured in terms of number of published articles. The standardization goals have been conducted through a simplified "5S" (Sort, Set in Order, Shine, Standardize, and Sustain) methodology, first considering a phase of awareness (the first three "S"), then identifying and implementing standardization actions (the last two "S"). Results: Since the beginning, 157 medical physicists joined the AIFM/SBRT-WG. Twenty-four papers/reviews/letters have been published in the period 2014-2019 on major radiation oncology journals, authored by >100 physicists (>50% working in small hospitals). Six over 12 first authors worked in peripheral/small hospitals, with no prior publication as first author. These studies contributed to the awareness and standardization phases for both small-field dosimetry and planning. In particular, errors in small-field measurements in 8% of centers were detected thanks to a generalized output factor curve in function of the effective field size created by averaging data available from different Linacs. Furthermore, planner's experience in SBRT was correlated with dosimetric parameters in the awareness phase; while sharing median dose volume histograms (DVHs) reduced variability among centers while keeping the same level of plan complexity. Finally, all the dosimetric parameters statistically significant to the planner experience during the awareness phase, were no longer significantly different in the standardization phase. Conclusions: The experience of our SBRT-WG has shown how a Lean Thinking mindset could foster the SBRT procedure standardization and spread the physics of SBRT knowledge, enhancing personal growth. Our expectation is to inspire other scientific societies that have to deal with fragmented contexts or pursue processes harmonization through Lean principles.

Patient specific quality assurance in SBRT: a systematic review of measurement-based methods

“…A National Working Group (WG) has been established within the Italian Association of Medical Physics (AIFM) with the goal of improving the quality and consistency of SBRT treatments across different centers. The WG aims to achieve its goals through regular meetings, collaboration on research projects, and by providing educational opportunities for medical physicists aiming for the SBRT standardization (Mancosu et al 2021). Multicentre studies (Esposito et al 2019, Talamonti et al 2019, Pallotta et al 2022 and specific reviews (Giglioli et al 2017, Esposito et al 2020, Mancosu et al 2022 were conducted in the past few years.…”

End-to-end test for lung SBRT: An Italian multicentric pilot experience

“…To support medical physicists in handling technical and dosimetric aspects of SBRT, the Italian Association of Medical Physicists created a working group (WG) on this issue in 2013 named AIFM/ SBRT-WG. One hundred and fifty-seven medical physicists from more than eighty Italian centres participated in SBRT-WG initiatives in 2021 [12].…”

5S management improves the service quality in the outpatient-emergency pharmacy: from management process optimisation to staff capacity enhancement

“…With the rapid development of society and the economy, optimisation of the management of healthcare systems has been increasingly needed to fulfil people’s growing requirement for high-quality medical service based on the premise of guaranteeing medical safety 1–3. Any disordered operation in the hospital could possibly have serious consequences, even medical negligence, threatening the health and lives of patients.…”