2012
DOI: 10.1080/09537287.2012.666899
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lean in UK Government: internal efficiency or customer service?

Abstract: This paper draws on service operations and Lean management in considering the relationship between internal service processes and customer service in public sector organisations. It draws on extensive evidence from two case studies of large UK Government departments to illustrate that whilst public service organisations recognise that methodologies such as Lean improves their internal processes to date they have not linked this to value or customer service. The paper presents a model which shows that public se… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
49
0
6

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
49
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…However, our case study brings together and elaborates on two other well-known causes for implementation failure. First, 'hard' and technical lean at the bottom of the organisational hierarchy, founded on an efficiency logic, has been shown to lead to sub-optimisation and lack of customer value (Radnor & Johnston, 2013;Radnor & Osborne, 2013). Second, critics of management consultancy blame it for conning organisations into faddish concepts by appealing rhetoric (Alvesson, 2012;Jung & Kieser, 2012).…”
Section: Discussion and Research Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, our case study brings together and elaborates on two other well-known causes for implementation failure. First, 'hard' and technical lean at the bottom of the organisational hierarchy, founded on an efficiency logic, has been shown to lead to sub-optimisation and lack of customer value (Radnor & Johnston, 2013;Radnor & Osborne, 2013). Second, critics of management consultancy blame it for conning organisations into faddish concepts by appealing rhetoric (Alvesson, 2012;Jung & Kieser, 2012).…”
Section: Discussion and Research Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hines et al (2004), consistent with Biege et al (2012), highlighted the need to address Lean's applicability outside a manufacturing environment in dealing with variability and its limited consideration of people related issues in OM -AS interfaces. The literature shows that there has been considerably less research in the application of Lean in OM -AS interfaces in comparison to that of product-based activities such as OM (Arlbjørn et al, 2011 andRadnor andJohnston, 2013;Del Palacio et al, 2011;Piercy and Rich, 2009). Lean in OM -AS has been identified as a key area for further research and development, typically within large organisations which is the focus of this paper (e.g.…”
Section: Lean In An Om-as Interfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, there was an organisational-wide promulgation of product based Lean PMs applied to all departments including production and applied services (Figure 1). Hence there was a need to explore how OM -AS actors perceived and interpreted these Lean PMs and demands, within the OM-AS interface space as suggested by Arlbjorn and Freytag (2013) and Radnor and Johnston (2013). Hence the first research question is as follows.…”
Section: Figure 2 -Lean Conceptualisation Of the Om-as Interface Spacementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However the methods and challenges of change are not industry specific (Balle, 2011;Bateman, Hines, & Davidson, 2014;Lander & Liker, 2007;Womack & Jones, 1996). Hence the thinking may be applied and adapted to many other situations such as service (Hadid & Mansouri, 2014), food supply (Vlachos, 2015), public sector (Bateman et al, 2014;Radnor & Johnston, 2013), knowledge work (McDermott & Venditti, 2015), construction (Sertyesilisik, 2014;Tommelein, 2015), and other industries.…”
Section: Lean Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%