Leaking legitimacies: the Finnish forest sector's entanglement in the land conflicts of Atlantic coastal Brazil

Abstract

Purpose -The aim of this paper is to focus on the legitimacy problems faced by the Finnish forest industry in the Brazilian context, specifically from the perspective of the region's indigenous communities: the Tupinikim, the Guarani and the Pataxó .Design/methodology/approach -The method used is qualitative research with a case study approach. The empirical data are based on the fieldwork in the states of Espírito Santo and Bahia. The aim was to scrutinize the corporate tactics in gaining societal legitimacy, both in Brazil and in Finland; these were categorized into thematic groups.Findings -The legitimacy of the Finnish companies becomes questionable due to the unethical tactics of their Brazilian business partner, Aracruz Celulose SA. When the company takes its ''marginal'' stakeholders' demands seriously and commits itself to them in diverse ways (economically, ecologically etc.), corporate social responsibility becomes a reality. The search for legitimacy also requires the company to change its corporate knowledge production systems, and also requires a willingness on the part of the company to encounter different types of knowledge that are locally attached.Originality/value -The study offers new information about the relationship between multinational corporations and local communities in Brazil -especially from the perspective of indigenous communities. The paper also contributes to legitimation research. Finally, the authors offer some concluding remarks considering the new cultural environments of Finnish companies operating in the global South.

Globalization as the ‘Pulping’ of Landscapes: Forestry Capitalism's North–South Territorial Accumulation

“…The globalizing Finnish forest cluster companies have been critical service and machinery providers and producers in investments based on corporate land use rather than smallholder-based forestry Lang, 2008a;Myllylä and Takala, 2011;Nylund and Kröger, 2012;Pakkasvirta, 2010). 2 Nordic firms and states took advantage of the global economic crises in the last decades of the twentieth century to establish a world-dominant pulp and paper sector, including related manufacturing and technology (Sonnenfeld, 1999).…”

Global Reporting Initiative and social impact in managing corporate responsibility: a case study of three multinationals in the forest industry

“…Public criticism of Stora Enso, a partially state‐owned company, has been severe, ranging from the old‐growth logging conflicts in the 1980s and 1990s (Joutsenvirta ) to Brazilian land‐use conflicts (Myllylä & Takala ) and recent mill closures in northern Europe. In 2010, the company strengthened its resources by establishing a separate global responsibility unit, launched a Web‐based forum where discussion between management and NGO representatives can be followed online, and gained publicity through its massive PR campaign in the Finnish media, with its idealistic and provocative slogans (see http://www.rethinkstoraenso.com/).…”

Holdings of National and Local Governments in Companies in Finland: Persistence and Change in the Longer Term

“…The transfer of the governance of government minority holdings in companies to the holding company Solidium Ltd in 2007 intended to make an end to all politics as concerns these companies. However, the international business operations of some of these companies have continued to implicate the Finnish government both among national and foreign scholars and political activists (Myllylä and Takala , Kröger ). Within Finland, the elevated management compensation in some of the companies in which the government has minority holdings in emulation of general global models (see, for instance, Shin ) has evoked criticism even among some of those political decision‐makers who originally introduced the compensation schemes (Ranki ).…”