Subsea Pipeline Integrity and Risk Management 2014
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-394432-0.00006-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leak Detection Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This non-computationally complex method makes the implementation of PPA easy. However, this technique cannot be used to localise leakage without combining it with other techniques (e.g., MVB) [51].…”
Section: Pressure Point Analysis (Ppa)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This non-computationally complex method makes the implementation of PPA easy. However, this technique cannot be used to localise leakage without combining it with other techniques (e.g., MVB) [51].…”
Section: Pressure Point Analysis (Ppa)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most detection techniques rely on the measurement of a physical quantity or reaction to a physical phenomenon, such as the acoustic, flow rate, pressure, gas sampling, optics, etc., and their combinations [ 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 ]. Among the current fault diagnosis methods for the oil and gas pipeline leakage, some are only suitable for the specific operating environment (e.g., soil–gas sampling method [ 10 ]) or mainly designed for gas leakage (e.g., ultrasonic flowmeter [ 11 ]); moreover, some sensors are difficult to install and the maintenance is costly (e.g., distributed optical fiber sensor method [ 12 ] and cable sensor [ 13 ]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are over 4 million kilometers (over 600 thousand kilometers in China) of pipelines buried under the Earth and marine seabed, and the diameter of at least 1/3 of the total pipelines is less than 12 inches (small-diameter pipeline, D<30cm) [ 4 , 5 , 6 ]. Generally, Pipeline Integrated Management (PIM) should be strictly conducted to ensure that the operating pipeline has a safety rate of 99.9%, computed accordingly to [ 7 , 8 ]. Corrosion, human activities, long-term Earth movement and natural disasters are the main reasons for an operation pipeline to be cracked, crooked, leakage or in the event of an explosion [ 9 , 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%