1983
DOI: 10.2307/2387959
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leaf Thickness of Mangroves (Rhizophora mangle) Growing in Different Salinities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Salinity response in Rhizophora species could be identified on leaf biomass. Higher exposed salinity stimulated ticker leaves area and water content (Camileri and Ribi, 1983).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Salinity response in Rhizophora species could be identified on leaf biomass. Higher exposed salinity stimulated ticker leaves area and water content (Camileri and Ribi, 1983).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In addition, Lima et al [79] reported significantly lower palisade, spongy parenchyma, and total leaf thickness for R. mangle. Furthermore, physical gradients such as waterlogging [80] and salinity [81][82][83] act on mangrove leaf morphology and pigment concentration and this, in turn, could affect the visible and NIR leaf reflectance.…”
Section: Spectral Signature and Chl Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The size of red mangrove leaves in the fringe forest is large, reflecting lower salinity stress because red mangrove leaves become smaller and thicker at higher salinities (Lugo et al 1981, Camilleri andRibi 1983). Senescent leaves are much smaller than the old mature ones (Table 3).…”
Section: Physiognomy and Ecophysiologymentioning
confidence: 99%