1996
DOI: 10.2307/2389052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leaf Decomposition in a Mexican Tropical Rain Forest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
7
0
5

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
5
7
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Monthly variations in k were significantly negatively correlated with rainfall of the current and previous 1–2 months and positively correlated with rainfall of the previous 6–7 months, which is similar to the seasonal trend in leaf litter production (Figure 3). While our monthly values of k are similar to those reported for other tropical forests [ Alhamd et al , 2004; Alvarez‐Sanchez and Enriquez , 1996; Sundarapandian and Swamy , 1999; Wieder and Wright , 1995], the relatively higher values of k during the dry season is opposite of what is typically observed for tropical systems. For example, Wieder and Wright [1995] and Alvarez‐Sanchez and Enriquez [1996] reported that k was usually higher in the wet season or in plots that received supplemental water during the dry season; however, in other field manipulative studies, plots exposed to partial rainfall exclusion (∼50% of the total monthly rainfall) had a similar k to plots receiving full rainfall.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Monthly variations in k were significantly negatively correlated with rainfall of the current and previous 1–2 months and positively correlated with rainfall of the previous 6–7 months, which is similar to the seasonal trend in leaf litter production (Figure 3). While our monthly values of k are similar to those reported for other tropical forests [ Alhamd et al , 2004; Alvarez‐Sanchez and Enriquez , 1996; Sundarapandian and Swamy , 1999; Wieder and Wright , 1995], the relatively higher values of k during the dry season is opposite of what is typically observed for tropical systems. For example, Wieder and Wright [1995] and Alvarez‐Sanchez and Enriquez [1996] reported that k was usually higher in the wet season or in plots that received supplemental water during the dry season; however, in other field manipulative studies, plots exposed to partial rainfall exclusion (∼50% of the total monthly rainfall) had a similar k to plots receiving full rainfall.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…On a global basis, soil carbon stocks are 2–3 times larger than aboveground C stocks [ Schlesinger , 1991] and approximately 70% of the total annual carbon flux is derived from litter decomposition (above plus belowground) [ Aerts , 1997]. Litter dynamics, including production, decomposition, and accumulation are vital links between plant and soil C and nutrient storage and cycling [ Schlesinger , 1991; Xu and Hirata , 2002], especially in humid tropical forests where nutrient availability is intimately tied to litter inputs and decomposition [ Morellato , 1992; Alvarez‐Sanchez and Enriquez , 1996; Sundarapandian and Swamy , 1999; Read and Lawrence , 2003; Alhamd et al , 2004; Dias , 2005].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[29] Our estimates of the litter decomposition rate constant (k) are similar to those published for other tropical or subtropical forests [Alhamd et al, 2004;Alvarez-Sanchez and Enriquez, 1996;Salamanca et al, 2003;Sundarapandian and Swamy, 1999;Wieder and Wright, 1995]; however, the seasonal trend is opposite of what is typically observed for tropical systems. Wieder and Wright [1995] and AlvarezSanchez and Enriquez [1996] reported significantly higher k values during the wet season, and irrigation delivered during the dry season has also been found to stimulate rates of decomposition [Wieder and Wright, 1995], suggesting that available soil moisture limits rates of litter decomposition.…”
Section: Litter Decomposition and The Surface Litter Poolsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Where litter traits shed light on the initial quality of decomposing leaves, fresh leaf traits are more closely linked to the plant’s growth strategy and are more widely available. Decomposition rate has been found to correlate positively with litter nitrogen (Kurokawa & Nakashizuka 2008; Parsons & Congdon 2008), phosphorus (Alvarez‐Sánchez & Becerra Enríquez 1996; Cornwell et al. 2008; Parsons & Congdon 2008) and cation concentrations (Mg, K and Ca; Alvarez‐Sánchez & Becerra Enríquez 1996), while it correlates negatively with molecules consisting of large carbon chains, such as lignin and cellulose (Vaieretti et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%