2020
DOI: 10.1007/jhep01(2020)094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leading-logarithmic threshold resummation of Higgs production in gluon fusion at next-to-leading power

Abstract: We sum the leading logarithms α n s ln 2n−1 (1 − z), n = 1, 2, . . . near the kinematic threshold z = m 2 H /ŝ → 1 at next-to-leading power in the expansion in (1 − z) for Higgs production in gluon fusion. We highlight the new contributions compared to Drell-Yan production in quark-antiquark annihilation and show that the final result can be obtained to all orders by the substitution of the colour factor C F → C A , confirming previous fixed-order results and conjectures. We also provide a numerical analysis o… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

4
87
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
4
87
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, using soft collinear effective theory (SCET) [48][49][50][51], subleading power infrared logarithms have been resummed to all orders both for the thrust event shape observable [1], which involves both soft and collinear real radiation, and for the case of threshold logarithms [35,52], which involve only soft real radiation (threshold logarithms were also resummed using diagramatic arguments in [43]). However, both these cases considered only subleading power corrections to gluon emission, which, as shown in [1], are related by symmetries to the leading power gluon emission, and therefore exhibit an exponentiation into a standard Sudakov exponential [53].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, using soft collinear effective theory (SCET) [48][49][50][51], subleading power infrared logarithms have been resummed to all orders both for the thrust event shape observable [1], which involves both soft and collinear real radiation, and for the case of threshold logarithms [35,52], which involve only soft real radiation (threshold logarithms were also resummed using diagramatic arguments in [43]). However, both these cases considered only subleading power corrections to gluon emission, which, as shown in [1], are related by symmetries to the leading power gluon emission, and therefore exhibit an exponentiation into a standard Sudakov exponential [53].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To improve the numerical performance, these power corrections can be included systematically by computing them in an expansion in the resolution variable about the soft and collinear limits. Recently, there has been significant interest and progress in understanding collider cross sections at subleading power [52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69]. In particular, for inclusive Higgs and Drell-Yan production the leading-logarithmic (LL) corrections at NNLO at next-to-leading power (NLP) are known for T 0 [70][71][72].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…for the result including quarks in QCD was presented in [57]. Subleading power infrared logarithms have also been resummed for color singlet production at kinematic threshold, when only soft real radiation is present [42,51,55].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%