2020
DOI: 10.1007/jhep07(2020)005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subleading power resummation of rapidity logarithms: the energy-energy correlator in $$ \mathcal{N} $$ = 4 SYM

Abstract: We derive and solve renormalization group equations that allow for the resummation of subleading power rapidity logarithms. Our equations involve operator mixing into a new class of operators, which we term the "rapidity identity operators", that will generically appear at subleading power in problems involving both rapidity and virtuality scales. To illustrate our formalism, we analytically solve these equations to resum the power suppressed logarithms appearing in the back-to-back (double light cone) limit o… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
74
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 125 publications
2
74
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that at fixed order the full angle EEC has been calculated analytically through O(α 2 s ) [148,149]. It will also be interesting to study the collinear expansions beyond leading power to shed light on the structure of TMD factorization at subleading power, in particular on the structure of rapidity divergences at subleading power [89,150,151].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that at fixed order the full angle EEC has been calculated analytically through O(α 2 s ) [148,149]. It will also be interesting to study the collinear expansions beyond leading power to shed light on the structure of TMD factorization at subleading power, in particular on the structure of rapidity divergences at subleading power [89,150,151].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much recent work has focused on exploring the structure of factorization at subleading order in power counting -a problem that turns out to be unexpectedly subtle and full of complexities. Specific applications discussed in the literature include the study of power corrections to event shapes [4] and transverse-momentum distributions [5,6], the threshold factorization for the Drell-Yan process [7,8], and the factorization of power-suppressed contributions to Higgs-boson decays [9,10]. One finds that such factorization theorems contain a sum over convolutions of Wilson coefficients with operator matrix elements, where the relevant SCET operators mix under renormalization.…”
Section: Jhep01(2021)077mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several new complications arise, which do not occur at leading power. The most puzzling one is the appearance of endpoint-divergent convolution integrals over products of component functions each depending on a single scale [6,[8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. In some sense, such endpoint divergences indicate a failure of dimensional regularization and the MS subtraction scheme, because some of the 1/ n pole terms are not removed by renormalizing the individual component functions, and hence naive scale separation is violated.…”
Section: Jhep01(2021)077mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here 0 ≤ x ≤ 1, and the track function satisfies the sum rule 4 Although we should emphasize that the perturbative simplicity of energy correlator observables has enabled a number of analytic calculations [24,29,[34][35][36] that were not possible for standard δ-function observables, leading to valuable perturbative data for improving our understanding of event shapes [55]. Although, as mentioned above, their moments are directly related to the energy flow polynomials which are a basis of tagging observables [39].…”
Section: A Incorporating Tracksmentioning
confidence: 99%