2011
DOI: 10.1123/jsm.25.6.550
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leadership Succession and Organizational Performance: Football Coaches and Organizational Issues

Abstract: If the team changes the coach, does the team’s performance change? From the literature on leadership succession and organizational performance, three perspectives have emerged that seek to answer this question: common sense, vicious cycle, and ritual scapegoat. We extend these leadership perspectives by drawing on organizational theory to explain leadership succession and organizational performance in National Collegiate Athletic Association Division Football Bowl Subdivision football. We develop a model and u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our paper makes four primary contributions. First, we agree with Rowe et al (2005), Soebbing and Washington (2011), Holmes (2011), and Adler, Berry, and Doherty (2013) that existing studies do not address the long-term impact of leadership succession. We provide a more longitudinal examination of succession by examining three time periods: the first, second, and fourth year following a performance base coaching change.…”
Section: Wwwjsm-journalcom Articlesupporting
confidence: 65%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our paper makes four primary contributions. First, we agree with Rowe et al (2005), Soebbing and Washington (2011), Holmes (2011), and Adler, Berry, and Doherty (2013) that existing studies do not address the long-term impact of leadership succession. We provide a more longitudinal examination of succession by examining three time periods: the first, second, and fourth year following a performance base coaching change.…”
Section: Wwwjsm-journalcom Articlesupporting
confidence: 65%
“…With regard to time, we examine the impact of the succession event over the short term (one and two years following the change), and also over a longer term, namely 4 years, to provide a more comprehensive account on organizational performance. We looked at a 4-year interval since this represents a typical recruiting cycle (Soebbing & Washington, 2011). Previous research has focused on short term impacts, such as within-season, between-season, or one year following the succession event.…”
Section: Theoretical Framework and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…34 It also supports the ritual scapegoat theory of succession. 35 Turning to match day related factors, we find that being the home team clearly increases both the expectation that Team i will win the game or earn at least one point in the match. Table 3 presents the regression results examining actual match outcomes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In line with this view, the fi of Smart and Wolfe (2000) indicated that organizational resources developed among coaching staffs are the critical sources of sustainable competitive advantage for intercollegiate athletic programs. Soebbing and Washington (2011) further found the significant effect of coaching succession on the subsequent performance of college football programs, confirming the important role coaches play in program success.…”
Section: Positive Relationship Between Past Performance and Total Commentioning
confidence: 56%