2015
DOI: 10.1177/1056492615572385
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leadership, Innovation, and Strategic Change

Abstract: Continuing the emerging tradition of the Knowledge and Innovation (K&I) Interest Group at the Strategic Management Society (SMS) Conference to interview foundational scholars in strategic management, we invited Professor Michael Tushman from Harvard Business School (HBS) as our guest of honor this year. The interview provided a rare opportunity to get behind the scenes of the author's much celebrated scholarly contribution to the field as well as his responses to some of the new findings within and across his … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
(65 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite these dynamic conditions, as with any new phenomenon, scholars can begin by using rich qualitative methods, such as process studies, ethnographic fieldwork, and multiple-case research designs, to gather in-depth data on how forms of conjoined agency are affecting organizations. For those willing to pursue this line of inquiry, studies are likely to have significant implications for several theories of organization and strategy (Seong, Kim, & Szulanski, 2015).…”
Section: Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite these dynamic conditions, as with any new phenomenon, scholars can begin by using rich qualitative methods, such as process studies, ethnographic fieldwork, and multiple-case research designs, to gather in-depth data on how forms of conjoined agency are affecting organizations. For those willing to pursue this line of inquiry, studies are likely to have significant implications for several theories of organization and strategy (Seong, Kim, & Szulanski, 2015).…”
Section: Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model evaluates how well an organization's strategy, organizational structure, and leadership style align with the CEO. It evaluates how well a CEO's style fits the structure, innovation, and cultural requirements of the business [36][37].…”
Section: ) the Tushman-o'reilly Congruence Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the Congruence Model, organizations are structures made up of interconnected components. The higher the degree of fit or congruence in the interaction phase, the more successful the organization is (Seong et al, 2015).…”
Section: Organizational Functionalitymentioning
confidence: 99%