2016
DOI: 10.1108/s1479-357120160000008013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leadership in Academia: Individual and Collective Approaches to the Quest for Creativity and Innovation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
1
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Strong leadership been linked to research success. [ 48–50 ] Our discussions on the day focused on leadership at an organisational level. Similarly, a recent paper by Dolovich et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strong leadership been linked to research success. [ 48–50 ] Our discussions on the day focused on leadership at an organisational level. Similarly, a recent paper by Dolovich et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While it could be said that Pearce's responsibilities are to be expected in an administrative leadership role (Braun, Peus, Frey, & Knipfer, 2016), what is interesting for many academic pioneers is that formal leadership roles do not close off the need for future personal growth and reflection. Mihalič (2015) for example observes that the opportunity to take on the position of chair of the BEST-EN Tourism Network presented Sheldon with the opportunity to learn more about sustainable tourism.…”
Section: Academic Leadership As a Critically Reflexive Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recruitment of quality staff is one of the challenges which academic leaders are currently experiencing in a university sector which is increasingly emphasizing performance and productivity exemplified by the link to quality research and global university rankings (Jepsen et al 2012). As increasing numbers of academics shift their priorities from teaching to research, there are additional tensions related to knowledge creation and transfer and the administrative processes which impede this progress (Braun et al 2016;Jepsen et al 2012).…”
Section: Recommendation 3: Institutional Recognition Should Be Providmentioning
confidence: 99%