2018
DOI: 10.1111/hequ.12194
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leadership development in Higher Education: A literature review and implications for programme redesign

Abstract: Leadership development (LD) activity and its effectiveness has not been explored rigorously across changing university settings globally. As Higher Education settings change radically throughout the world, Higher Education professionals are operating in more uncertain environments, and leaders are taking increasingly complex and diverse approaches to their leadership roles. LD activities therefore become important in supporting this highly complex context, yet little is known in the literature about LD and its… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
83
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
2
83
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite this important organizational role, research (Dopson et al, 2019) suggests many heads receive inadequate training for the position. It has been posited (Bolman and Gallos, 2011) that faculty who come from fields with a background in leadership studies (e.g., business administration, social psychology, educational leadership) are somewhat better prepared for departmental leadership.…”
Section: Research Base On Academic (Departmental) Leadershipmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite this important organizational role, research (Dopson et al, 2019) suggests many heads receive inadequate training for the position. It has been posited (Bolman and Gallos, 2011) that faculty who come from fields with a background in leadership studies (e.g., business administration, social psychology, educational leadership) are somewhat better prepared for departmental leadership.…”
Section: Research Base On Academic (Departmental) Leadershipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This leadership role is often assumed with limited warning, leaving many departmental administrators entering positions without much formal training, significant prior experience, understanding of the ambiguity and complexity of the position, preparation to lead within a system of shared governance, realization that administration requires a metamorphic change from professorial work, and preparation to balance personal and professional lives (Gmelch et al, 2017). Adding to the complexity, as higher education demographics and organizational expectations change, heads function in more uncertain and increasingly complex institutional environments (Dopson et al, 2019). During times of increasingly scarce financial and human resources, heads are further challenged to equity manage their units, ensuring that programs and personnel are adequately supported.…”
Section: Research Base On Academic (Departmental) Leadershipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is centered on enabling leaders to provide direction, influence subordinates and other leaders to perform better, establish internal and external relationships with stakeholders and initiate sustainable change through the access to information. Meanwhile, [8] defines "digital leadership as requiring reflection on online self-awareness and congruence, grappling with the controversy that comes with cyber civility and how to be a digital citizen prepared to inspire positive social change". Figure 1 depicts the facets of digital leadership in conjunction with the features of leadership and the leadership styles that are prevalent in universities.…”
Section: Conceptualization Of Digital Leadershipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Major trends have emerged such as the "virtual university" which is digitalized and requires leaders with very strong information and communication technology (ICT) capabilities. [8] suggests that to have a competitive edge, collaboration, strategic partners, joint ventures and managed networks are pivotal in universities. These authors further argue that the digitalization of universities requires a leadership style that is distinctive and cooperative as opposed to the vertically integrated style seen in universities which are informed by the hierarchical structures.…”
Section: Effects Of Digital Leadership In Universitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whilst this has been disputed by numerous HoDs that throughout the university there were no leadership development plans. According to Dopson et al (2018), there is a paucity of literature on leadership development to support complex roles in universities, as well as limited leadership interventions. This has been aggravated by contested debates on the leadership development syllabus, and content in the medical industry.…”
Section: Strategies To Develop Employees In the Universitymentioning
confidence: 99%