Leadership attributes, masculinity and risk taking as predictors of crisis proneness

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to examine the extent to which leadership attributes, masculinity, risk taking and decision making affect perceived crisis proneness.Design/methodology/approachThe paper draws mainly on the literature about gender, leadership and organizational crisis to explore whether masculinity predicts crisis proneness, and the extent to which leadership attributes as well as risk‐taking and decision‐making style are efficient predictors of perceived crisis preparedness (CP). Utilizing pertinent literature and concepts, the paper evaluates a database of 231 female and male managers.FindingsAs hypothesized, masculinity is positively associated, whereas transformational leadership is inversely associated with perceived crisis proneness. Both participative decision making and passive management predict higher degree of perceived crisis proneness and so does risk taking.Research limitations/implicationsMore in‐depth research as well as larger and more diverse sample is required to explore more definitively why and how masculinity is positively associated with crisis proneness.Practical implicationsThe paper provides preliminary evidence regarding the merits of feminine leadership traits as facilitators of CP This finding does not, however, preclude the usefulness of masculine attributes in managing actual organizational crises. The findings appear particularly relevant given the current turbulent business environments and the increasing frequency and magnitude of corporate crises.Originality/valueThe paper synthesizes evidence on CP proneness and gender, and the evidence of feminine attributes as an important antidote to perceived crisis proneness. The paper outlines reasons for this phenomenon and implications for placement of managers in current business arenas.

CEO succession, gender and risk taking

“…For example, despite observations such as Ibarra and Hansen's (2009) that women are twice as likely as men to be appointed from outside the company our results suggest that without sufficient representation of women on the board, even a policy of outside promotion is unlikely to result in more female CEOs. In terms of gender and risk taking (examined in general in Sheaffer et al, 2011;Maxfield et al, 2010;Beckmann and Menkoff, 2008), the only factor analyzed in our study of risk taking by newly appointed female CEOs, that rivals gender for statistical significance is profitability (measured as industry adjusted ROA). It is reasonable to expect that firms consider their degree of profitability when establishing the risk profile of the firm.…”

“…We also address the question of risk taking by female CEOs. The relation between gender and risk taking is an empirical issue, but the two have often been thought of as linked (Sheaffer et al, 2011;Maxfield et al, 2010;Beckmann and Menkoff, 2008). Some of these studies involve risk taking as revealed by questionnaires, simulations or experiments (Maxfield et al, 2010).…”

Grace under fire: aesthetic leadership in clinical nursing

“…Sheaffer et al . () found a link between masculine traits, crisis proneness and noticeable risk taking among leaders. While domination of females in the nursing workforce is acknowledged (AIHW ), little emphasis is evident on the influence of gender on clinical leadership effectiveness in nursing.…”

Opening the “Black Box”. Factors Affecting Women's Journey to Top Management Positions: A Framework Applied to Chile

“…While the literature highlights the technical/business ability to strategize and develop a vision (Appelbaum et al, 2013), most of the skills typically required from those at the top are "soft skills", such as adaptability and acquisition of novel knowledge, skills and capabilities (Ellemers et al, 2012); communication of performance (Grant and Taylor, 2014;Ibarra and Obodaru, 2009;Ibarra and Sackley, 2011); leadership (Sheaffer et al, 2011); negotiation (Hawley, 2014); and networking skills (Brands and Kilduff, 2014).…”