2016
DOI: 10.1108/ijpl-03-2016-0007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leadership and elite interviews

Abstract: The focus of this article is a critical evaluation of constructivist-grounded theory in elite interviews, the methodology used for this research. The research is about the challenges of the EU rail industry integration as seen and told by the involved actors. In particular, the integration process requires leadership in the multi-level governance context of the EU and in the transition from state monopolies to businesses providing services on the integrated market. This provides a potential source of theoretic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 38 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The focus of this research was on organisational cultural narratives to create more effective responses to complexity. Similar research within large public agencies has highlighted the value of the elite interview method for understanding complex organisational change management situations (Schara and Common 2016). Hochschild (2009) notes that fewer focussed interviews with respondents chosen for their detailed knowledge of a subject are likely to yield richer data than other sampling approaches.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The focus of this research was on organisational cultural narratives to create more effective responses to complexity. Similar research within large public agencies has highlighted the value of the elite interview method for understanding complex organisational change management situations (Schara and Common 2016). Hochschild (2009) notes that fewer focussed interviews with respondents chosen for their detailed knowledge of a subject are likely to yield richer data than other sampling approaches.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%