2020
DOI: 10.4000/philonsorbonne.1511
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Le fou, le solipsiste et le philosophe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, "Freud accuses philosophers of acting like paranoids who produce mythical projections." (Bosselet S., 2016) Another example is provided by Wittgenstein (2006) who considers the philosopher to be "uttering nonsense, who uses expressions that are detached from all use, without giving himself the means to give them meaning" (Aucouturier V., 2020). However, it is an approach that allows creativity by not being attached to uses.…”
Section: Philosophical Aspects Of This Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, "Freud accuses philosophers of acting like paranoids who produce mythical projections." (Bosselet S., 2016) Another example is provided by Wittgenstein (2006) who considers the philosopher to be "uttering nonsense, who uses expressions that are detached from all use, without giving himself the means to give them meaning" (Aucouturier V., 2020). However, it is an approach that allows creativity by not being attached to uses.…”
Section: Philosophical Aspects Of This Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cependant rappeler, comme le fait Aucouturier, qu'il est propre au langage du schizophrène de soulever la question de sa compréhension, ne signifie pas qu'il serait de ce fait incompréhensible. Au contraire, ce que l'on montre par-là même c'est justement que la parole du schizophrène « n'est pas que du langage mais aussi et surtout la parole d'un individu qui partage et a appris le langage » 12 . Dans la continuité de ces analyses, l'article de Mathieu Frèrejouan, « Délire, croyance et non-sens », propose de revenir sur la question, propre à la philosophie analytique contemporaine, de savoir si le délire est, ou non, une croyance.…”
Section: Le Langage Du Délire : Philosophie Et Psychiatrieunclassified