Le contexte, les partenaires et le processus : les contraintes éthiques dans les recherches collaboratives

Larouche, Jean-Marc; Genard, Jean-Louis; Escoda, Marta Roca i; Diaz, Pablo

doi:10.4000/sociologies.15268

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A recent issue of SociologieS , the journal of the International Association of French-speaking Sociologists (AISLF), is dedicated to ethical issues in collaborative research. Larouche et al (2020) have edited several articles dealing with the ambiguous ethical assumption that a well-prepared and reflexive collaboration between researchers and research subjects can be democratic, fair, and equal. However, this commonly assumed epistemological point of departure leads in certain cases to control or even censorship of research outcomes, which cannot be published in case the final results do not correspond to the self-perception of the research participants, as Jean-Michel Chaumont shows in his contribution on mistrust in collaborative research (2020).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Researching and practicing ARTIVISM through field-crossing: an innovative method for collaborative research

Salzbrunn¹

2021

Open Res Europe

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

While collaborative research has mainly focused on the relationship between researchers and research partners in the field, several recent works have contributed to reflecting on the relationships between researchers of various backgrounds and roles, and the challenges and benefits of teamwork. While conducting the ERC-funded ARTIVISM project, I have continued to rethink the ways research can be conducted collectively, especially when starting from a multi-sensory approach and by applying apprenticeship and audio-visual techniques. I developed the method of field-crossing, which allows the researcher to regularly contrast perspectives and perceptions, and which helps researchers regain emotional and intellectual independence after an intensive, year-long period of fieldwork as and among artivists. The article shows how field-crossing allows its practitioners to reflect in an innovative way on their positioning in a field, open new perspectives, integrate surprises and disruptive and unexpected developments, and cope with inner and collective conflicts. Finally, collective feedback sessions about text and image publications (comics, films) with the artivists are not only part of our ethical approach but also serve as elicitation sessions which reflect the complexity of field relations and individual and collective perspectives among and between field-crossers and artivists.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Researching and practicing ARTIVISM through field-crossing: an innovative method for collaborative research

Salzbrunn¹

2021

Open Res Europe

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Les « ethnographies suffisamment bonnes » revisitées : analyse ethnographique des organisations, approche participative et liens entre les mondes sociaux

Guay

2022

Recherches qualitatives

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Le contexte, les partenaires et le processus : les contraintes éthiques dans les recherches collaboratives

Cited by 2 publications

References 4 publications

Researching and practicing ARTIVISM through field-crossing: an innovative method for collaborative research

Researching and practicing ARTIVISM through field-crossing: an innovative method for collaborative research

Les « ethnographies suffisamment bonnes » revisitées : analyse ethnographique des organisations, approche participative et liens entre les mondes sociaux

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About