1993
DOI: 10.1016/0009-8981(93)90027-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LDL sialic acid content in patients with coronary artery disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ruelland et al 25 found a far less marked decrease (23%) than that reported by Orekhov and coworkers. Melajärvi et al 26 found no difference between patients with and without CAD, either in diabetic or nondiabetic individuals.…”
mentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Ruelland et al 25 found a far less marked decrease (23%) than that reported by Orekhov and coworkers. Melajärvi et al 26 found no difference between patients with and without CAD, either in diabetic or nondiabetic individuals.…”
mentioning
confidence: 59%
“…310 Downloaded by [University of Tasmania] at 14: 33 29 September 2015 Desialylation of LDL enhances uptake by aortic smooth muscle cells, 311,312 but not by fibroblasts or hepatocytes. 308,313 Low sialic acid content in LDL is associated with increased risk of coronary heart disease in some [314][315][316] but not in all studies. 317,318 Alcohol drinking might affect the metabolism of LDL by interfering with its sialylation, but this has not been studied so far.…”
Section: B Sialylation Of Lipoproteinsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A minor fraction of circulating desialylated LDL (5%–10% of total LDL) could be detected in the blood of healthy subjects. In atherosclerotic patients, desialylated LDL levels are significantly increased (by 1.5- to 6-fold) compared to healthy individuals [158,159] and can account up to 60% of total LDL in CAD patients [154]. Small dense LDL particles exhibited a profound deficiency in sialylation rate correlated with increased atherogenicity of this subfraction [159].…”
Section: Ldl Modificationsmentioning
confidence: 99%