2013
DOI: 10.1177/1536867x1301300312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lclogit: A Stata Command for Fitting Latent-Class Conditional Logit Models via the Expectation-Maximization Algorithm

Abstract: In this article, we describe lclogit, a Stata command for fitting a discrete-mixture or latent-class logit model via the expectation-maximization algorithm.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
120
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(130 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
120
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An interesting feature of this choice experiment is that the majority of respondents (57.5%) always chose one option, typically routine monitoring (49.1%), with fewer preferring CPM (8.4%). In DCE parlance, this is referred to as “non‐trading.” Based on standard information criteria (Pacifico & Yoo, ), the latent class analysis identified three groups of respondents: Prefer CPM (12% of women) who indicated a preference for CPM in the majority of choices; Prefer Monitoring (59%) who preferred routine monitoring in the majority of choices; and Traders (29%) who were prepared to swap between CPM and routine monitoring. The factors influencing choice as described by the latent class analysis are reported in Table .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…An interesting feature of this choice experiment is that the majority of respondents (57.5%) always chose one option, typically routine monitoring (49.1%), with fewer preferring CPM (8.4%). In DCE parlance, this is referred to as “non‐trading.” Based on standard information criteria (Pacifico & Yoo, ), the latent class analysis identified three groups of respondents: Prefer CPM (12% of women) who indicated a preference for CPM in the majority of choices; Prefer Monitoring (59%) who preferred routine monitoring in the majority of choices; and Traders (29%) who were prepared to swap between CPM and routine monitoring. The factors influencing choice as described by the latent class analysis are reported in Table .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the results of the qualitative research and pilot survey, we hypothesised that we could categorise women into groups based on the similarity of their preferences, or how they made choices, between routine monitoring and CPM. Given the potential for such groups to exist, we used latent class analysis (Pacifico & Yoo, ), similar to cluster analysis, to analyse the choices women made. This assumes that the probability an individual will choose a particular option is conditional on them belonging to a particular group and is a widely used in the analysis of choices in health care (Zhou, Thayer, & Bridges, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Second, heterogeneity in respondent preferences is examined through latent class analysis, by variant, using the lclogit command in Stata (Pacifico & Yoo, 2013). This analysis assumes that respondents can be divided into subgroups (or classes) depending on their preferences.…”
Section: Analyses Of Quantitative Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Regarding latent class models, the numerical maximization method can be difficult because the inverted Hessian or approximate Hessian is hard to calculate with a large number of parameters (Train, ). We estimate the parameters with the expectation‐maximization (EM) algorithm using the Stata command lclogit (Pacifico & Yoo, ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%