2015
DOI: 10.5755/j01.sace.11.2.10291
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LCA as comparative tool for concrete columns and glulam columns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The scope definition needs an explicit description of the subject to be studied (e.g., an engineered wood product), functional unit, system boundary, data requirements, impact categories selected, and other scope definition items. , Previous LCAs of engineered wood products commonly select product-level units as their functional units (e.g., 1 m 3 of wood product, 1000 board feet of wood product). Among those, 1 m 3 of engineered wood products is the most adopted in previous literature. Other product-level functional units are related to specific constructional applications (e.g., 1 m 2 of the roof, 30 m 2 of surface decking) to compare with traditional building materials (e.g., steel). For example, Petersen and Solberg used 1 m 2 roof as the functional unit to compare the life-cycle energy consumption and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of glulam and steel . Besides, stand-level functional units (e.g., 1 ha forest land) can be used to incorporate the effects of forest management strategies and forest yield into the LCA of wood products …”
Section: Lca Of Engineered Wood Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The scope definition needs an explicit description of the subject to be studied (e.g., an engineered wood product), functional unit, system boundary, data requirements, impact categories selected, and other scope definition items. , Previous LCAs of engineered wood products commonly select product-level units as their functional units (e.g., 1 m 3 of wood product, 1000 board feet of wood product). Among those, 1 m 3 of engineered wood products is the most adopted in previous literature. Other product-level functional units are related to specific constructional applications (e.g., 1 m 2 of the roof, 30 m 2 of surface decking) to compare with traditional building materials (e.g., steel). For example, Petersen and Solberg used 1 m 2 roof as the functional unit to compare the life-cycle energy consumption and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of glulam and steel . Besides, stand-level functional units (e.g., 1 ha forest land) can be used to incorporate the effects of forest management strategies and forest yield into the LCA of wood products …”
Section: Lca Of Engineered Wood Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides the selection of impact categories, the selection of LCIA methods is essential. Common impact assessment methods include TRACI (adopted by refs ,,,,, ), ReCiPe (used by refs ,,, ), USEtox (employed by refs ,,, ), CML (utilized by refs ,,,,, ), and Eco-indicator 99 (applied in refs ,, ) …”
Section: Lca Of Engineered Wood Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies were published on how to separate attached cement mortar from the aggregate surface from waste concrete (e.g., via heat treatment and abrasion or separation by microwave heating) [25,26]. The LCA method is one possible way to compare the environmental impacts of concrete structural elements [27].…”
Section: Literature Review Of the Environmental Assessment Of Recyclementioning
confidence: 99%
“…LCA: In order to make the LCI, data collection and quantification of energy input-output were required; as well as the affectation made by the analyzed systems. The database used for the LCI was Ecoinvent V3.0 [28], which is of recognized use in various European investigations due to its representativeness, evaluation transparency and accuracy of the data [9,13,[29][30][31]. The Swiss Federal Offices and the ETH Zurich developed this database, which has a global level, and contains a wide spectrum of activities and systems; its selection for this research is because the information available in the Spanish field is limited or null.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%