2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-9002(99)00899-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Layout techniques to enhance the radiation tolerance of standard CMOS technologies demonstrated on a pixel detector readout chip

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
51
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
51
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results presented were obtained on laboratory-grade oxides, but were verified on commercial-grade oxides around a decade later, when available commercial CMOS processes with lithographic dimensions as small as 250 nm were using gate oxides 5.2 nm thick [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The results presented were obtained on laboratory-grade oxides, but were verified on commercial-grade oxides around a decade later, when available commercial CMOS processes with lithographic dimensions as small as 250 nm were using gate oxides 5.2 nm thick [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…In fact all the in-pixel transistors have been designed with source and drain physically enclosed using an Enclosed Layout Geometry (ELG) [10], [11] in order to reduce the edgeleakage, which is generated in the transition area between the thin gate oxide and the thick field oxide, used to produce transistor-by-transistor insulation, after exposure to radiation. P + doped guard rings have been added in each pixels to prevent radiation induced inter-device leakage current.…”
Section: B the Radiation Hard Design Of The Dynamite Detectormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the original model had to be adjusted; this adjustment may not be optimal and could have influenced the result. The model after [12] is optimized for square device, and thus does not take into account the broken corner. The model after [11] relies on empirical coefficient (in our case 0, whereas the authors of [11] propose a value between 1 and 2), which is obviously technology dependent.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We consider contributions of Giraldo et al [10], Xue et al [11] and Snoeys et al [12]; additionally we compare simple mid-line approximation and our new equilateral trapezoid transistor approximation methodology.…”
Section: Annular Gatementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation