2018
DOI: 10.1080/13557858.2018.1562053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Layers of information: interacting constraints on breast cancer risk-management by high-risk African American women

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, these data suggest that specific personal characteristics are associated with chemoprevention awareness. In general, we find that women who use more nuanced information gathering strategies are also more likely to know about chemoprevention, and that knowing basic prevention information enables women to ask more detailed questions that could lead to actually considering specific risk-reduction behaviors [43]. Future studies should explore access to and use of risk-management information in more detail, since these dynamics are critical to the ability of high-risk women to make healthprotective decisions.…”
Section: Concern Example Quotesmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Second, these data suggest that specific personal characteristics are associated with chemoprevention awareness. In general, we find that women who use more nuanced information gathering strategies are also more likely to know about chemoprevention, and that knowing basic prevention information enables women to ask more detailed questions that could lead to actually considering specific risk-reduction behaviors [43]. Future studies should explore access to and use of risk-management information in more detail, since these dynamics are critical to the ability of high-risk women to make healthprotective decisions.…”
Section: Concern Example Quotesmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Interviews covered a range of topics, including perceived breast cancer risk; sources and content of risk information; understanding and consideration of prevention options; decision-making processes and networks; and psychosocial well-being. Other findings from the parent project have been published and are under review elsewhere [3,[43][44][45].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Qualitative research with African American women with hereditary breast cancer risk found that decisions to engage in cancer risk management behaviors are associated with 3 accumulated layers of risk information: perceived risk at the foundational layer, general information about managing breast cancer risk at the middle layer, and specific information about risk-management options at the most proximal layer. 29 African American women experience distinct dynamics at each of these layers compared with non-Hispanic White women. The authors noted that information access is associated a Unadjusted bivariate analyses with generalized estimating equations were performed by combining all events (performance of a screening mammogram) occurring during the 18 months of usual care before BCRA with all events occurring over 18 months after participants underwent BCRA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These differences may stem from access inequities or other barriers to receiving desired care. In one qualitative study of women at high risk of breast cancer, Black American women had considerably less access to specialists and knowledge about risk reduction options and more pressing health concerns that warranted their immediate attention and resources than their White counterparts, 48 reflecting the broadly recognized pattern of systemic disadvantage and structural racism in health care faced by people of color in America. [49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56] Accordingly, it is not surprising that Black women with BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants in the United States have lower rates of uptake of and adherence to cancer risk-reducing interventions than women from other racial groups.…”
Section: Interacting Patient-level and Societal Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%