2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2009.04.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Layered growth with bottom-spray granulation for spray deposition of drug

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 6 depicts the tip penetrations with time at two different temperatures: T = 22 and 90 • C. The tip penetration distance L increases with the load pressure and time [14]. This steady increasing trend reveals that evaporation of water affects the tip penetrations [15].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 6 depicts the tip penetrations with time at two different temperatures: T = 22 and 90 • C. The tip penetration distance L increases with the load pressure and time [14]. This steady increasing trend reveals that evaporation of water affects the tip penetrations [15].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Figure 10 depicts the tip penetrations with time at 80°C heating temperature. It was observed that the tip penetration increases with load pressure and time [21]. Up to 60 ms, there was a linear increase in tip penetration and thereafter a plateau.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chlorpheniramine maleate (BP grade, China) was used as a model drug. (18) Granules are irregular in shape (18) "One-pot" system for contained production (19) More spray drying of binder solution Bottom spray Smaller granules (20) Denser granules (20,21) Spherical granules with better flow (21) Slower granule growth (20) Smoother surface granules (22) Higher risk of overwetting Less spray drying of binder solution (23) Need reasonably well flowing feed powders Robust process at low spray rate (21). Tangential spray Supports higher spray rate (24,25) Denser granules (25,26) Less dependent on flow properties of powder feed (26) Material loss due to adhesion to friction plate (26) Powder elutriation only at higher airflow (24) Scale-up designs are expensive and impractical Granule growth is relatively uniform (25) Risk of bed overwetting is high Granules have good flow properties (25,26) Granules have low friability (25) Homogeneous drug distribution (26) …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%