2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.vacuum.2004.12.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Layer uniformity of glancing angle deposition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the spot-to-spot, substrate-to-substrate, and batch-to-batch variabilities are quite small, we are continuing to investigate the source of this variation to make further improvements. Experimental variables such as the presence of other deposited materials and the substrate location (i.e., distance from the metal source) have been identified as factors that also affect the SERS activity …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the spot-to-spot, substrate-to-substrate, and batch-to-batch variabilities are quite small, we are continuing to investigate the source of this variation to make further improvements. Experimental variables such as the presence of other deposited materials and the substrate location (i.e., distance from the metal source) have been identified as factors that also affect the SERS activity …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cross-sectional dimensions of the substrate were 21 mm×23 mm. The OAD and SBD methods usually produce thin films with uniformity at these length scales 29 . The deposition rate was typically 0.3 nm s − 1 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[43][44] Effective distance between the source and substrate in our fabrication chamber was maintained at $35 cm. The effect of source to substrate distance is beyond the scope of this work and will be pursued in a forthcoming communication.…”
Section: Hydrophilic/hydrophobic Probe Molecules and Wetting Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also to be noted that the change in distance between source and substrate inside the evaporation chamber can bring variation in signal intensity, and this primarily could be attributed to the variation in nanorod length and morphology. [43][44] Effective distance between the source and substrate in our fabrication chamber was maintained at $35 cm. The effect of source to substrate distance is beyond the scope of this work and will be pursued in a forthcoming communication.…”
Section: Hydrophilic/hydrophobic Probe Molecules and Wetting Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%