2002
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.66.041601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Layer-by-layer epitaxy in limited mobility nonequilibrium models of surface growth

Abstract: We study, using noise reduction techniques, layer by layer epitaxial growth in limited mobility solid-on-solid nonequilibrium surface growth models, which have been introduced in the context of kinetic surface roughening in ideal molecular beam epitaxy. Multiple hit noise reduction and long surface diffusion length lead to qualitatively similar layer by layer epitaxy in 1+1 and 2+1 dimensional limited mobility growth simulations. We discuss the dynamic scaling characteristics connecting the transient layer by … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An alternative class of systems to model nonequilibrium surface growth are discrete lattice growth models which are known as limited mobility (LM) models [57][58][59][60][61]. Due to their simplicity, these models are especially suitable to investigate scaling properties, to study kinetic surface roughening and morphological properties as well as to investigate details like crossover and longlived transient effects in nonequilibrium surface growth [62,63,68,69]. In LM models, the process rates that are used in KMC simulations are replaced by a certain set of stochastic rules for particle movements that depend on the local environment of the position of particle adsorption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An alternative class of systems to model nonequilibrium surface growth are discrete lattice growth models which are known as limited mobility (LM) models [57][58][59][60][61]. Due to their simplicity, these models are especially suitable to investigate scaling properties, to study kinetic surface roughening and morphological properties as well as to investigate details like crossover and longlived transient effects in nonequilibrium surface growth [62,63,68,69]. In LM models, the process rates that are used in KMC simulations are replaced by a certain set of stochastic rules for particle movements that depend on the local environment of the position of particle adsorption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This would enable us, for example, to study the asymptotic regime of the surface growth where we expect to observe scaling behavior of the growing surface. In particular, one would like to extract the corresponding critical exponents describing the scaling of the surface roughness [85] without being limited by finite-size effects or computational manipulations like the noise reduction technique (NRT) [80][81][82][83][84].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies of the kinetic surface roughening models for molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) growth has long been an interesting research topics [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. This is because MBE technique is very effective in growing high quality films.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A substantial amount of works have been done to incorporate the ES barrier into MBE growth model [2,3,[9][10][11][12][13]. One of the earliest works studied a stochastic SOS Monte Carlo model in the presence of a potential barrier [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of mound morphology, a missing feature in one spatial dimension, suggests that a given model may belong to a different universality class in a different dimension, thus rendering the universality class concept futile. [27][28][29] In this paper we propose, in addition to ES barrier, a competing mechanism for mound formation as a consequence of probabilistic terrace currents due to the geometry of a film's crystalline structure. We begin, in Section II, by describing the helical boundary conditions essential for constructing representations of various crystal structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%