2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2012.01420.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lay people's and health professionals’ views about breaking bad news to children

Abstract: Physicians in training and in practice need to be aware that lay people--and likely parents as well--have diverse and complex opinions about when and how parents should give bad health news to their children.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As in the work of Muñoz Sastre et al . (), a cluster analysis was performed on the raw data according to the procedure advocated by Hofmans and Mullet (); that is, we used K‐means clustering on Euclidian distances. A four‐cluster solution was identified.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As in the work of Muñoz Sastre et al . (), a cluster analysis was performed on the raw data according to the procedure advocated by Hofmans and Mullet (); that is, we used K‐means clustering on Euclidian distances. A four‐cluster solution was identified.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Its approach was similar to that of the study by Muñoz Sastre et al . () of people's views about telling bad news to young children about their own illness. We expected to find several qualitatively different personal positions similar to those found by Muñoz Sastre et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Each participant was tested either individually or in small group of less than four persons. As recommended by Anderson (; see also Muñoz Sastre, Sorum, & Mullet, , Muñoz Sastre, Sorum, & Mullet, ) regarding this kind of study, the session had two phases. In the familiarization phase, the experimenter explained what was expected and presented each participant with 14 scenarios taken randomly from the complete set.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%