The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.112068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lavandula x intermedia essential oil and hydrolate: Evaluation of chemical composition and antibacterial activity before and after formulation in nanoemulsion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
42
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
3
42
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The most abundant compounds were oxygenated monoterpenes (91.2 %) such as linalool (23.1 %), camphor (16.3 %), 1,8-cineole (14.5 %), linalool acetate (10.0 %), borneol (5.2 %) and caryophyllene oxide (2.1 %). Similar oil patterns have been reported in previously published papers (Bajalan et al, 2017;Blažeković et al, 2018;Carrasco et al, 2016;Garzoli et al, 2020). Sesquiterpenes and their oxygenated forms are much less abundant in the essential oil than oxygenated monoterpenes with total values of 0.7 % and 3.3 %, respectively.…”
Section: Essential Oil Chemical Compositionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most abundant compounds were oxygenated monoterpenes (91.2 %) such as linalool (23.1 %), camphor (16.3 %), 1,8-cineole (14.5 %), linalool acetate (10.0 %), borneol (5.2 %) and caryophyllene oxide (2.1 %). Similar oil patterns have been reported in previously published papers (Bajalan et al, 2017;Blažeković et al, 2018;Carrasco et al, 2016;Garzoli et al, 2020). Sesquiterpenes and their oxygenated forms are much less abundant in the essential oil than oxygenated monoterpenes with total values of 0.7 % and 3.3 %, respectively.…”
Section: Essential Oil Chemical Compositionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Our results of lavandin hydrolat chemical composition are not in accordance with the majority of previously published reports, where linalool was the most abundant compound (42-56 %), followed by cam- phor (13-24 %) and 1,8-cineole (8-24 %), while linalool oxide isomers were detected in smaller amounts (3-6 %) (Baydar and Kineci, 2009;Politi et al, 2020;Yohalem and Passey, 2011). Some other sources reported components such as 1,8-cineole and camphor as the most dominant in lavandin hydrolat (53 and 67 %, respectively) (Garzoli et al, 2020;Jeon et al, 2013). Reports dealing with the chemical composition of true lavender (L. angustifolia) hydrolats also indicate a high content of linalool (26-52 %) (Kaloustian et al, 2008;Prusinowska et al, 2016;Śmigielski et al, 2013).…”
Section: Hydrolat Chemical Compositionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…To describe the volatile fraction of the EOs and HYs vapor phase, a Perkin-Elmer Headspace Turbomatrix 40 (Waltham, MA, USA) autosampler connected to GC-MS was used for the headspace analysis. The operative conditions were performed as previously described [ 72 , 73 , 74 ]. About 1 mL of EO and 2 mL of HY were placed separately in 20 mL vials sealed with headspace PTFE-coated silicone rubber septa and caps.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lastly, hydrolate exhibited promising results in the control of fungal growth on paper artwork, suppressing the four tested strains at concentrations of 25-50% [32]. The plant part [51] or date of harvest [20], processing plant material (fresh or dry) [47], as well as the extraction method [20], or formulations such as nanoemulsion [28], also influence the chemical composition and further antimicrobial properties. Apart from this, it is established that hydrolate exhibited considerable antibacterial activities against the Gram-positive bacteria, while Gram negative bacteria were found to be resistant.…”
Section: Antimicrobial Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is most probably due to its outer membrane [43,52]. Furthermore, only L. intermedia hydrolate formulated in nanoemulsion exhibited activity against E. coli (MIC value was 0.75%) and B. cereus (MIC value 0.60%), whereas pure hydrolate was inactive on both bacteria strains [28].…”
Section: Antimicrobial Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%