2018
DOI: 10.1039/c7cp07276g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lattice mismatch as the descriptor of segregation, stability and reactivity of supported thin catalyst films

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(50 reference statements)
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By comparing the results of the calculations with the Ag substrate with those without the Ag substrate, we could not observe any specific impact of the Ag substrate on the Al stacking fault energy more than three layers away from the Ag/Al interface region. This is in agreement with the recent findings that the effect of substrate for fcc overlayers is lost already after the third layer ( 23 )). From these results, we can conclude that the twinning in the grains far off the deposit is due to the electrodeposition process and not linked to the interface.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…By comparing the results of the calculations with the Ag substrate with those without the Ag substrate, we could not observe any specific impact of the Ag substrate on the Al stacking fault energy more than three layers away from the Ag/Al interface region. This is in agreement with the recent findings that the effect of substrate for fcc overlayers is lost already after the third layer ( 23 )). From these results, we can conclude that the twinning in the grains far off the deposit is due to the electrodeposition process and not linked to the interface.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…It was recently shown that many properties of such thin films, including chemisorption properties, converge quickly with the thickness of the film and depend only on the lattice mismatch between the overlayer and the support. This means that from the difference between the lattice constants one can estimate chemisorption energies if data are known for pure overlayer [45] (Figure 6).…”
Section: Figure 5 Correlation Between the Binding Energies Of Ch3 (δmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…electronic structure) effects due to both the strainingo ft he pure metal and to 'seeping' of the alloy wavefunctionf rom regionsb elow the surface. Computational studies of A 3 B( whereA= Pt and Pd, and B = Cu, Ag and Au) [14] and of alloy-core@Pt nanoparticles [15] have shown that strain effects may persist for surface trilayers though ligand effects are more quickly damped with overlayer thickness and become markedlyl ess significanta fter single or bilayer surfacec overings. Studies of Pt(111)s urface layers on Pt 25 Ni 75 (111) [16] have shown ligand effects are significant for a2monolayer (ML) surface Pt thickness, but strain effects dominate for 3-4 ML thicknesses.T hese observations suggest the range of validity of the approachu sed in the current work is for Pt overlayers which have thicknesses !…”
Section: Characterisation Of the Pt-alloy Bulk And Surfacementioning
confidence: 99%