1943
DOI: 10.2134/agronj1943.00021962003500040004x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lattice and Lattice Square Designs with Oat Uniformity Data and in Variety Trials1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

1962
1962
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gains in efficiency up t o 362% have been reported-the relative efficiency depending largely upon soil variability in the experimental area. Wilsie (1954) states that theoretically, under average conditions, the efficiency of lattice designs would be expected to increase with the number of strains in the test and points out that data reported by Cochran (1941), Johnson and Murphy (1943) and Robinson, Rigney and Harvey (1948) tend t o confirm this principle. Wilsie (1954) showed that for a series of alfalfa trials the average efficiency of the lattice design compared with the randomized block was 164%.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Gains in efficiency up t o 362% have been reported-the relative efficiency depending largely upon soil variability in the experimental area. Wilsie (1954) states that theoretically, under average conditions, the efficiency of lattice designs would be expected to increase with the number of strains in the test and points out that data reported by Cochran (1941), Johnson and Murphy (1943) and Robinson, Rigney and Harvey (1948) tend t o confirm this principle. Wilsie (1954) showed that for a series of alfalfa trials the average efficiency of the lattice design compared with the randomized block was 164%.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Since then, the efficiency of the lattice design, with and without recovery of inter--block information, as compared to complete block design and neighbor analysis, has been analyzed by many researchers. The superior accuracy of the lattice design was demonstrated in many studies (Atwood & Garber, 1942;Myers, 1942;Zuber, 1942;Johnson & Murphy, 1943;Wellhausen, 1943;Lin et al, 1993;Saad, 1994a,b). However, in some studies the block design was more efficient (Torrie et al, 1943, andBancroft &Smith, 1949).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Due to its implication on the selective process by decreasing the correlation between phenotypic and genotypic values, the genotype x environment interaction is a complex and widely investigated problem, which must be considered in breeding programs. Since a high number of treatments is normally used in these experiments, the lattice design has been frequently used (Zuber, 1942;Johnson & Murphy, 1943;Torrie et al, 1943;Wellhausen, 1943;Bancroft & Smith, 1949;Sahagun-Castellanos & Frey, 1990;Beninati & Busch, 1992;Chaves & Miranda Filho, 1992;Singh et al, 1992;Arriel et al, 1993;Lin et al, 1993;Michelini & Hallauer, 1993;Moncada et al, 1993;Oliveira, 1993;Ferrão et al, 1994, andRezende &Ramalho, 1994), contributing to increase experimental error control efficiency (Cochran &Cox, 1957, andFederer, 1955).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%