Latin American protected areas: Protected from chemical pollution?

Abstract

Protected areas (PAs) are critically important means to preserve species and maintain natural ecosystems. However, the potential impacts of chemical pollution on PAs are seldom mentioned in the scientific literature. Research on the extent of the occurrence of chemical pollution inside PAs and in-depth assessments of how chemical contaminants may adversely affect the maintenance of species abundance, species survival, and ecosystem functions are scarce to nonexistent. We investigated 1) the occurrence of chemical contaminants inside 119 PAs in Latin America from publically available databases, and 2) reviewed case studies of chemical contaminants and pollution in 4 Latin American PAs. Cases of chemical pollution and contamination inside Latin American PAs mostly originated from sources such as mining, oil, and gas extraction. To date, the focus of the research on chemical pollution research inside Latin American PAs has been primarily on the detection of contamination, typically limited to trace metals. Where management actions have occurred, they have been reactive rather than proactive. Protected areas established in wetlands are the most affected by chemical pollution. Based on the information from the pollution and/or contamination occurrence and the case studies analyzed, Latin American PAs are not well safeguarded from chemical pollution, resulting in both challenges and opportunities to conserve biodiversity and ecosystems. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2017;13:360-370. © 2016 SETAC.

Experimental Evidence of Contamination Driven Shrimp Population Dynamics: Susceptibility of Populations to Spatial Isolation

“…Measures should be developed and then taken to maintain suitable ecosystems for organisms, either by restricting human activities, contamination sources or protecting the areas where organisms can meet their nutritional requirements and the predator-prey relationship remains unthreatened by contamination (Depledge and Galloway, 2005;Gilarranz et al, 2017). However, it should be taken into consideration that contamination can reach these protected areas from multiple, indirect and external sources (Rodríguez-Jorquera et al, 2016). Therefore, to prevent habitat fragmentation and reduce the ecological imbalance at the landscape level to protect the biodiversity and function of ecosystems, it is necessary to identify potential sources of contamination and to monitor their effects; not only from an individual perspective (toxicity), but also from a landscape perspective (spatial distribution of organisms and connectivity among populations).…”

Freshwater biodiversity conservation through source water protection: Quantifying the potential and addressing the challenges

“…As a result, threats outside the borders of a PA (e.g. dams, water withdrawals, agriculture, mining, forestry, or urbanization) can impinge upon the ecosystems and species within them (Rodríguez-Jorquera et al, 2017;Thieme et al, 2016). In addition, many freshwater species are highly mobile, and they may encounter threats outside a PA that reduce their viability inside the PA.…”

The landmark Escazú Agreement: An opportunity to integrate democracy, human rights, and transboundary conservation

“…Latin America and the Caribbean's (LAC) globally important biodiversity is under threat from multiple anthropogenic activities, such as habitat change and pollution (Rodríguez Garavito & Baquero Díaz, 2020), and human rights violations are hindering the capacity of social movements to protect the environment (Butt et al., 2019). These threats are rarely restricted to single countries, as many ecosystems are shared across political borders (e.g., Rodríguez‐Jorquera et al., 2017; Anderson et al., 2018). Weak governance and lack of collaboration among jurisdictions has allowed these threats to escalate (Coumans, 2019).…”