Latest Customizations of XP: A Systematic Literature Review

Anwer, Faiza; Aftab, Shabib

doi:10.5815/ijmecs.2017.12.04

Cited by 17 publications

(15 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Unlike the revision of the literature for a narrative or descriptive scope, this methodology involves documenting all the procedures undertaken (Ginieis, Sánchez-Rebull, and Campa-Planas 2012). Sharing what is claimed by some authors (Denyer and Neely 2004), this section describes the steps of the methodology used (Anwer and Aftab 2017). They are reported below.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 97%

Systematic Literature Review on Smart Mobility: A Framework for Future “Quantitative” Developments

Francini

Chieffallo

Palermo

et al. 2021

Journal of Planning Literature

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This work aims to reorganize theoretical and empirical research on smart mobility through the systematic literature review approach. The research goal is to reach an extended and shared definition of smart mobility using the cluster analysis. The article provides a summary of the state of the art that can have broader impacts in determining new angles for approaching research. In particular, the results will be a reference for future quantitative developments for the authors who are working on the construction of a territorial measurement model of the smartness degree, helping them in identifying performance indicators consistent with the definition proposed.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 97%

Systematic Literature Review on Smart Mobility: A Framework for Future “Quantitative” Developments

Francini

Chieffallo

Palermo

et al. 2021

Journal of Planning Literature

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…For the selection of most relevant research articles with high quality measures, a detailed procedure is adopted in this study along with some specific structure and boundary lines as explained by [21] and [22]. Guidelines for this Systematic Literature Review are also taken from latest review papers in software engineering domain such as [23], [24], [25].…”

Section: Research Protocolmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sentiment Analysis using SVM: A Systematic Literature Review

Ahmad¹,

Aftab²,

Bashir³

et al. 2018

ijacsa

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The world has revolutionized and phased into a new era, an era which upholds the true essence of technology and digitalization. As the market has evolved at a staggering scale, it is must to exploit and inherit the advantages and opportunities, it provides. With the advent of web 2.0, considering the scalability and unbounded reach that it provides, it is detrimental for an organization to not to adopt the new techniques in the competitive stakes that this emerging virtual world has set along with its advantages. The transformed and highly intelligent data mining approaches now allow organizations to collect, categorize, and analyze users' reviews and comments from micro-blogging sites regarding their services and products. This type of analysis makes those organizations capable to assess, what the consumers want, what they disapprove of, and what measures can be taken to sustain and improve the performance of products and services. This study focuses on critical analysis of the literature from year 2012 to 2017 on sentiment analysis by using SVM (support vector machine). SVM is one of the widely used supervised machine learning techniques for text classification. This systematic review will serve the scholars and researchers to analyze the latest work of sentiment analysis with SVM as well as provide them a baseline for future trends and comparisons.

show abstract

“…These basic principles are about frequent team communication, customer satisfaction, managing frequent changing requirements even at later stages of development and early delivery of partial working software [1], [28], [31], [33], [35], [47], [48]. Many agile process models are used by the software industry now a days such as: Extreme Programming (XP), Scrum, Feature Driven Development (FDD), and Dynamic System Development Method (DSDM) [3], [5], [11], [37]. Extreme programming (XP) is one of popular agile process models for the development of small scale projects as well as widely used by the software industry [5], [41], [42], [43], [51].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Presenting and Evaluating Scaled Extreme Programming Process Model

Ibrahim¹,

Aftab²,

Ahmad³

et al. 2020

IJACSA

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Extreme programming (XP) is one of the widely used software process model for the development of small scale projects from agile family. XP is widely accepted by software industry due to various features it provides such as: handling frequent changing requirements, customer satisfaction, rapid feedback, iterative structure, team collaboration, and small releases. On the other hand, XP also holds some drawbacks, including: less documentation, less focus on design, and poor architecture. Due to all of these limitations, XP is only suitable for small scale projects and doesn't work well for medium and large scale projects. To resolve this issue many researchers have proposed its customized versions, particularly for medium and large scale projects. The real issue arises when XP is selected for the development of small scale and low risk project but gradually due to requirement change, the scope of the project changes from small scale to medium or large scale project. At that stage its structure and practices which works well for small project cannot handle the extended scope. To resolve this issue, this paper contributes by proposing a scaled version of XP process model called SXP. The proposed model can effectively handle such situation and can be used for small as well as for medium and large scale project with same efficiency. Furthermore, this paper also evaluates the proposed model empirically in order to reflect its effectiveness and efficiency. A small scale client oriented project is developed by using proposed SXP and empirical results are collected. For an effective evaluation, the collected results are compared with a published case study of XP process model. It is reflected by detailed empirical analysis that the proposed SXP performed well as compared to traditional XP.

show abstract

Latest Customizations of XP: A Systematic Literature Review

Cited by 17 publications

References 25 publications

Systematic Literature Review on Smart Mobility: A Framework for Future “Quantitative” Developments

Systematic Literature Review on Smart Mobility: A Framework for Future “Quantitative” Developments

Sentiment Analysis using SVM: A Systematic Literature Review

Presenting and Evaluating Scaled Extreme Programming Process Model

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About