2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.patcog.2010.08.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Latent visual context learning for web image applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The conventional quantization approach can be altered by using multi-vocabulary merging technique to achieve better performance [14]. We can also improve our current image similarity measure by considering discriminative capability of the inliers, such as IDF information or the weights of inliers suggested in [39], which is calculated based on the PageRank algorithm on visual word link graph.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The conventional quantization approach can be altered by using multi-vocabulary merging technique to achieve better performance [14]. We can also improve our current image similarity measure by considering discriminative capability of the inliers, such as IDF information or the weights of inliers suggested in [39], which is calculated based on the PageRank algorithm on visual word link graph.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the same goal, Zhou et al proposed a multi-layer graph to rerank the image list based on their visual words, where PageRank approach was applied on the both visual word link graph and image link graph [39]. In [40], Deng et al suggested a co-regularized multi-graph learning framework, where the intra-graph and inter-graph constraints were imposed to achieve better retrieval performance by weak learning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these, query expansion [8][24] [25] reissues initial top-ranked results to find valuable features which are not present in the original query; spatial verification [26][5] filters those false-positives by checking geometric consistency of matched features, build efficient representation for false match filtering [7] [27], or extracts visual phrases [28] to verify matches on the more robust feature groups; and diffusion-based algorithms [29], including those based on graphs [9][30] [31] [32] propagate affinities or beliefs via a graph structure to capture the high-level connections between images. Also there are other methods aimed at selecting high-quality features [33], discovering feature co-occurrence [34] [35], extracting contextual information [36][37] [38], incorporating nearest-neighbor information [39] [40], adopting an alternative matching kernel [41], combining different searching results [42], or dealing with similarity between features [43]. Other recent proposed post-processing methods include [44] [45].…”
Section: E Post Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…c-f Saliency maps generated by LSP using patch decomposition in 8 × 8, 16 × 16, 32 × 32 and 64 × 64, respectively Similar to LGD, we decompose a source image into patches and initialize the saliency value of each patch p i,j with (1). Then we propagate the saliency from all the patches to p i,j , which is similar to VisualRank [22,50]:…”
Section: Location Based Saliency Detection Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%