2009
DOI: 10.1190/1.3272700
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Latent space modeling of seismic data: An overview

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the SOM has the same relatively high dimension of the input data, by construction SOM preserves the adjacent relationship among each SOM quantized vector (Matos et al, 2007). In this manner, SOM can be interpreted as a mapping of seismic attributes residing in r-dimension space onto a 1D, 2D, or 3D latent-space that preserves the original topological structure of the seismic amplitude data (Wallet et al, 2009). In this paper, we assume that the input variables to the SOM are the GLCM attributes, while the resulting 2D SOM is mapped against a 2D color bar.…”
Section: Self-organizing Mapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the SOM has the same relatively high dimension of the input data, by construction SOM preserves the adjacent relationship among each SOM quantized vector (Matos et al, 2007). In this manner, SOM can be interpreted as a mapping of seismic attributes residing in r-dimension space onto a 1D, 2D, or 3D latent-space that preserves the original topological structure of the seismic amplitude data (Wallet et al, 2009). In this paper, we assume that the input variables to the SOM are the GLCM attributes, while the resulting 2D SOM is mapped against a 2D color bar.…”
Section: Self-organizing Mapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such texture attributes hold significant promise in quantifying geological features such as mass transport complexes, amalgamated channels, and dewatering features that exhibit a distinct lateral pattern beyond simple edges. Like seismic waveform classification (Coléou et al, 2003), and spectral components, GLCM attributes are amenable to subsequent clustering analysis using selforganizing and generative-topographic maps (Angelo et al, 2009;West et al, 2002;Gao, 2007;Wallet et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liu and Luo (2007) and Ni (2008) applied LLE and Isomap 1D seismic attribute optimization, respectively. While Wallet et al (2009) proposed using manifold learning to model the lower-dimension manifold characteristics of a latent space embedded in attribute space and they pointed out that manifold learning is extremely computationally demanding both in terms of processing and memory but they didn't put it into practice. The previous research only tried to apply manifold learning to single traces but not to 3D seismic attribute dimensionality reduction and didn't deeply discuss the selection of its key parameters (such as the number of neighbors).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GTM finds a model based on a probability density function (PDF) that describes the distribution of the D-dimensional data in terms of smaller number of latent variables, or cluster nodes that approximate the vast majority of the probability mass of the data (Svensen, 1998). Wallet et al (2009) are probably the first to apply the GTM technique to seismic data, using a suite of phantom horizon slices through a seismic amplitude volume generating a "waveform classification." After iterative parameter estimation, the model fits the data, and we relate the points in the D-dimensional data space to grid points or nodes in the lower L-dimensional latent space.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%