2011
DOI: 10.1190/geo2010-0150.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrated seismic texture segmentation and cluster analysis applied to channel delineation and chert reservoir characterization

Abstract: In recent years, 3D volumetric attributes have gained wide acceptance by seismic interpreters. The early introduction of the single-trace complex trace attribute was quickly followed by seismic sequence attribute mapping workflows. Three-dimensional geometric attributes such as coherence and curvature are also widely used. Most of these attributes correspond to very simple, easy-to-understand measures of a waveform or surface morphology. However, not all geologic features can be so easily quantified. For this … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(36 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interpretation / August 2017 SK129 feed the SOM are texture (homogeneity and entropy), peak frequency, and peak magnitude attributes. These attributes are extracted from the raw amplitude data using software developed at the University of Oklahoma (e.g., Matos et al, 2011;Qi et al, 2016).…”
Section: Soms and Geomorphologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interpretation / August 2017 SK129 feed the SOM are texture (homogeneity and entropy), peak frequency, and peak magnitude attributes. These attributes are extracted from the raw amplitude data using software developed at the University of Oklahoma (e.g., Matos et al, 2011;Qi et al, 2016).…”
Section: Soms and Geomorphologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kachine learning (ML) techniques have been reliably used in geoscience interpretation for almost two decades including seismic-facies classification (de Matos et al, 2011;Qi et al, 2016;Zhao et al, 2017), electrofacies classification (Allen and Pranter, 2016), and analysis of seismicity (Kortström et al, 2016;Sinha et al, 2018). Traditionally, geoscience ML applications rely on a carefully selected set of features or attributes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Machine learning (ML) techniques have been successfully applied, with considerable success, in the geosciences for almost two decades. Applications of ML by the geoscientific community include many examples such as seismic-facies classification (Meldahl et al, 2001;West et al, 2002;de Matos et al, 2011;Roy et al, 2014;Qi et al, 2016;Hu et al, 2017;Zhao et al, 2017), electrofacies classification (Allen and Pranter, 2016), and analysis of seismicity (Kortström et al, 2016;DeVries et al, 2018;Perol et al, 2018;Sinha et al, 2018), and classification of volcanic ash (Shoji et al, 2018), among others. Conventionally, ML applications rely on a set of attributes (or features) selected or designed by an expert.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%