2013
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwt286
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Latent Class Models in Diagnostic Studies When There is No Reference Standard--A Systematic Review

Abstract: Latent class models (LCMs) combine the results of multiple diagnostic tests through a statistical model to obtain estimates of disease prevalence and diagnostic test accuracy in situations where there is no single, accurate reference standard. We performed a systematic review of the methodology and reporting of LCMs in diagnostic accuracy studies. This review shows that the use of LCMs in such studies increased sharply in the past decade, notably in the domain of infectious diseases (overall contribution: 59%)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
145
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 172 publications
(150 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
145
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Further studies are needed to estimate test characteristics, either defining subsets of true positive and true negative samples or applying latent class analysis [65,66].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further studies are needed to estimate test characteristics, either defining subsets of true positive and true negative samples or applying latent class analysis [65,66].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used Bayesian latent class analysis to simultaneously estimate the accuracy of the 5 tests with regard to the detection of CPTB, the prevalence of CPTB, and the degree of under-and overtreatment in the cohort. Latent class analysis has successfully been used in other studies of the accuracy of diagnostic tests in the absence of a gold standard (12,(17)(18)(19). However, here we present one of the first applications of latent class analysis to prospectively collected data on CPTB.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this study on data quality [19], the 65 volunteers labelled 269 sites from a series of images and, when attributing a land cover type, volunteers also declared how confident they were (input using a slider with a label, e.g., 'sure'). The derivation of the land cover class-specific accuracies per volunteer (producer's accuracies) and of the land-cover classes estimation from posterior probabilities were possible using a Latent Class Analysis (LCA) model estimation (see [22] for a recent review on using LCA to assess the accuracies of new 'diagnostic tests' without a gold standard in the context of medical applications).…”
Section: Land Cover Validation Examplementioning
confidence: 99%