2022
DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.11.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Late-Stage Pancreatic Cancer Detected During High-Risk Individual Surveillance: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…International Cancer of Pancreas Screening (CAPS) Consortium was then established with the aim of early diagnosis of PC for those with familial risk, and the first consensus conference was held in 2011 (14) with a recent update in 2019 (15). The consensus meeting strongly recommended EUS and MRI as screening modalities due to their high resolution and lack of ionizing radiation although a recent meta-analysis suggested the difficulty of diagnosis of malignant lesions in the early stage (18). Although several studies have reported the usefulness of screening in HRIs (10)(11)(12), these data had been published mainly from Western countries, and data from Asia, such as Japan, are still lacking.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…International Cancer of Pancreas Screening (CAPS) Consortium was then established with the aim of early diagnosis of PC for those with familial risk, and the first consensus conference was held in 2011 (14) with a recent update in 2019 (15). The consensus meeting strongly recommended EUS and MRI as screening modalities due to their high resolution and lack of ionizing radiation although a recent meta-analysis suggested the difficulty of diagnosis of malignant lesions in the early stage (18). Although several studies have reported the usefulness of screening in HRIs (10)(11)(12), these data had been published mainly from Western countries, and data from Asia, such as Japan, are still lacking.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the latter, recent reports have shown, unfortunately, that incidental PDAC exists and that 12-month surveillance may sometimes be ineffective [57,58]. In addition, a non-negligible amount of PDAC detected within surveillance is diagnosed at an advanced stage, raising the question of whether this surveillance strategy may be tailored according to an individualized risk-profile [59]. If the screening is negative for pancreatic abnormalities, then it should be repeated annually to possibly improve the early identification of PDAC or pre-malignant lesions.…”
Section: Preventative Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the basis of these early findings, however, multiple professional society guidelines now recommend that EUS-/MRCP-based PDAC surveillance be considered for individuals with PDAC susceptibility gene PGVs and a family history of PDAC, and/or those from familial pancreatic cancer families. 19,23,24 Other recent data, 25,26 however, have demonstrated disappointing rates of advanced-stage PDAC in high-risk individuals undergoing regular EUS-/MRCP-based surveillance, highlighting the importance of long-term outcomes data.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both studies also demonstrate reasonable numbers-needed-to-screen to detect a single PDAC case (70 CDKN2A carriers/y in Klatte et al 7 and 194 high-risk individuals/y in Dbouk et al 27 ). Another more sobering lesson learned from these studies 7,27 and others, 21,25,26 however, is the rapid pace at which PDACs can develop even in high-risk individuals undergoing regular surveillance, including numerous cases of non-stage I PDACs diagnosed within 12 months of prior reassuring imaging. Nonetheless, the encouraging long-term outcomes reported by these two studies 7,27 reinforce guidelines 19,23,24 recommending MRCP-/EUS-based PDAC surveillance for certain individuals with genetic/familial high risk.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%