2017
DOI: 10.1126/science.aal2482
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Late Pleistocene archaic human crania from Xuchang, China

Abstract: Two early Late Pleistocene (~105,000- to 125,000-year-old) crania from Lingjing, Xuchang, China, exhibit a morphological mosaic with differences from and similarities to their western contemporaries. They share pan-Old World trends in encephalization and in supraorbital, neurocranial vault, and nuchal gracilization. They reflect eastern Eurasian ancestry in having low, sagittally flat, and inferiorly broad neurocrania. They share occipital (suprainiac and nuchal torus) and temporal labyrinthine (semicircular c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
97
0
6

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 168 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
5
97
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Although some authors have also noted a modern‐like pattern of midfacial topography in the Chinese Middle Pleistocene record, such as in the partially distorted specimen from Dali, the two Yunxian skulls, and the specimen from Nanjing, all of these seem to be younger than the TD6 hominins. Furthermore, other colleagues have noted possible Neandertal influences in Chinese late Middle Pleistocene hominins . This may be a suggestion about possible phylogenetic relationships between eastern and western Eurasian populations during the late Early and Middle Pleistocene.…”
Section: Final Considerations and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Although some authors have also noted a modern‐like pattern of midfacial topography in the Chinese Middle Pleistocene record, such as in the partially distorted specimen from Dali, the two Yunxian skulls, and the specimen from Nanjing, all of these seem to be younger than the TD6 hominins. Furthermore, other colleagues have noted possible Neandertal influences in Chinese late Middle Pleistocene hominins . This may be a suggestion about possible phylogenetic relationships between eastern and western Eurasian populations during the late Early and Middle Pleistocene.…”
Section: Final Considerations and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…If R is indeed the root of modern mtDNA, then the modern lineage should not be much older than 45000 years old. In fact, while partially modern skeletons can be found in many sites in Africa and Asia at 310000-80000 years ago 14,15,47-53 , no human skeletons that were fully modern for all key skeletal features have been found prior to 50000 years ago 54 . As the demise of Neanderthals is thought to be associated with the arrival of modern humans and occurred at ∼40000 years ago 45 , one can infer that the appearance of fully modern humans may not be much earlier than 40000 years ago.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The general lack of Neanderthal fossils in this Southern route may reflect the relatively small effort so far invested in this region (with only few Homo fossil finds like Narmada from ~200,000 years ago who is broadly classified as H. heidelbergensis). Indeed several fossils in China show Neanderthal features such as the inner-ear formation in the ~100,000 year old Xujiayao and Xuchang Man (4,(74)(75)(76). Certain mysterious Southern China fossils such as the 11,500-15,500 year old 'Red Deer Cave' people with hybrid features of modern and archaic humans may also be candidates for Asian relatives of Neanderthals, especially considering their taurodont teeth (77).…”
Section: Cc-by-ncmentioning
confidence: 99%