1990
DOI: 10.1016/0040-1951(90)90397-q
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Late Mesozoic-Cenozoic strike-slip and block rotation in the inner belt of southwest Japan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
28
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
5
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They also dated the samples and found that kinematics. Also shown is the distribution of crustal blocks suspected by Kanaori [ 1990] in SW Japan and the direction of the maximum horizontal stress after Jolivet et al [1991 A similar chronology is found in the northern Chubu district (Yatsuo area) where Itoh [1988] also supports a smaller rotation within the Denticulopsis Lauta zone (younger than 15.7 Ma). Both studies found no significant rotation between 20 and 15 Ma.…”
Section: Paleomagnetic Constraintssupporting
confidence: 55%
“…They also dated the samples and found that kinematics. Also shown is the distribution of crustal blocks suspected by Kanaori [ 1990] in SW Japan and the direction of the maximum horizontal stress after Jolivet et al [1991 A similar chronology is found in the northern Chubu district (Yatsuo area) where Itoh [1988] also supports a smaller rotation within the Denticulopsis Lauta zone (younger than 15.7 Ma). Both studies found no significant rotation between 20 and 15 Ma.…”
Section: Paleomagnetic Constraintssupporting
confidence: 55%
“…This two-stage tectonic history of the Nojima fault is compatible with the regional structural analysis (Kanaori, 1990 ;Fabbri et al, 2004 ;Famin et al, 2014), which reveals a sinistral wrenching in the Paleogene (65 to 23 Ma), followed by fault-normal extension in the Miocene (23 to 6 Ma) and a dextral slip active since the Plio-Quaternary (≤ 2 Ma). In the present paper, we focus on deformation microstructures formed during the first period of seismic activity in a sample, which was in the 3.7 -11.1 km depth range as constrained by the laumontite stability field 5 before being exhumed and sampled at 220 m depth by the GSJ drillhole.…”
Section: Geological Settingsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Southwest Japan is not a single block, and rotations are only local: Kanaori (1990) proposed that Southwest Japan can be divided in several blocks which have rotated like dominos in a strike-slip regime. In such a case there is no direct relation between the angle of paleomagnetic rotation and the angle of rigid rotation of Southwest Japan as a whole; it has thus no direct implications on the timing of backarc opening.…”
Section: Tectonic Timing and Paleomagnetic Rotationsmentioning
confidence: 99%