2019
DOI: 10.1049/iet-ipr.2018.5054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Late fusion of deep learning and handcrafted visual features for biomedical image modality classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But both networks have their own advantages, it is difficult to decide which one is more reliable. Late fusion is quite common in biomedical image modality classification [45], we explore more score‐based fusion methods for global and local problems, taking the maximum of the two scores as the final result as well as adding the two scores by weight. The fusion algorithms are defined as right left right left right left right left right left right left0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em3ptrel_scorei=max(g_scorei,l_scorei) right left right left right left right left right left right left0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em3ptrel_scorei=ωrg_scorei+(1ωr)l_scorei where rel_scorei is the score result corresponding to the i th label, g_scorei and l_scorei are the global score and local score corresponding to the i th label, ωr is the weight assigned to the global score.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But both networks have their own advantages, it is difficult to decide which one is more reliable. Late fusion is quite common in biomedical image modality classification [45], we explore more score‐based fusion methods for global and local problems, taking the maximum of the two scores as the final result as well as adding the two scores by weight. The fusion algorithms are defined as right left right left right left right left right left right left0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em3ptrel_scorei=max(g_scorei,l_scorei) right left right left right left right left right left right left0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em3ptrel_scorei=ωrg_scorei+(1ωr)l_scorei where rel_scorei is the score result corresponding to the i th label, g_scorei and l_scorei are the global score and local score corresponding to the i th label, ωr is the weight assigned to the global score.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cross-media feature fusion approaches [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] can be roughly divided into two groups: early fusion based and late fusion based. The early fusion based approaches combine feature representations of different media data into an unified feature representation before classification, while the late fusion based approaches combine the results of the classifiers for different media data.…”
Section: Cross-media Feature Fusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deep learning (DL) approaches can be used as a late step in most fusion strategies (Lee, Mohammad & Henning, 2018). Most of CT and CXR images in medical applications can be handcrafted and fuzed in score level fusion strategy (Baumgartl et al, 2020).…”
Section: Deep Learning In Image Fusion Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%