2013
DOI: 10.1080/16742834.2013.11447087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Last Glacial Maximum Sea Surface Temperatures: A Model-Data Comparison

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hargreaves et al [2011] found that simulated NSSTs in PMIP1 and PMIP2 did not give unreliable estimates of global MARGO data when the model results were treated as an ensemble; i.e., the spread in model results was comparable to observational uncertainty. However, Dail and Wunsch [2014] found that individual PMIP2 simulations did not fit MARGO data within their uncertainties in the North Atlantic, and ensemble averages reported by Braconnot et al [2007] and individual model results from Tao et al [2013] showed North Atlantic cooling patterns with an east-west gradient opposite that seen in the data. Ballarotta et al [2013] compared LGM simulations at 1°and 0.25°hor-izontal resolution in the NEMO (Nucleus for European Modeling of the Ocean) OGCM and found that increasing resolution to permit the presence of eddies did not have a significant LGM temperature reconstructions and the World Ocean Atlas [Conkright et al, 1998].…”
Section: Computation Of Regional Averages and Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hargreaves et al [2011] found that simulated NSSTs in PMIP1 and PMIP2 did not give unreliable estimates of global MARGO data when the model results were treated as an ensemble; i.e., the spread in model results was comparable to observational uncertainty. However, Dail and Wunsch [2014] found that individual PMIP2 simulations did not fit MARGO data within their uncertainties in the North Atlantic, and ensemble averages reported by Braconnot et al [2007] and individual model results from Tao et al [2013] showed North Atlantic cooling patterns with an east-west gradient opposite that seen in the data. Ballarotta et al [2013] compared LGM simulations at 1°and 0.25°hor-izontal resolution in the NEMO (Nucleus for European Modeling of the Ocean) OGCM and found that increasing resolution to permit the presence of eddies did not have a significant LGM temperature reconstructions and the World Ocean Atlas [Conkright et al, 1998].…”
Section: Computation Of Regional Averages and Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Understanding the spatiotemporal covariance of deglacial ML δ 18 O c will also improve abilities of δ 18 O c records to constrain deglacial circulation. , Braconnot et al, 2007, Tao et al, 2013, Dail and Wunsch, 2014. The inability of models to reproduce apparently robust large-scale temperature changes at the LGM represents a gap in our understanding of how the climate was different during that time; it is unknown whether missing physics or other model errors are driving the misfit, or whether it arises from biases in the observations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the tropical oceans, Otto-Bliesner et al (2009) found that PMIP2 models had a similar range of global-mean NSST decrease to that estimated by MARGO and larger cooling in the Atlantic than in the Pacific, also in agreement with the observations, but that zonal gradients of LGM cooling in tropical Pacific near-surface waters were less pronounced than in MARGO. Model ensemble averages reported by Braconnot et al (2007) and individual model results from Tao et al (2013) show North Atlantic cooling patterns with a zonal gradient opposite that seen in the data. Data errors contributing to these disagreements could arise from chronological errors, seasonal biases, and biological effects, to name a few.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Disagreements among general circulation model (GCM) representations of the Last Glacial Maximum [LGM; circa 23-19 thousand years ago (ka); Mix et al (2001)] and between models and LGM paleoceanographic data (Braconnot et al 2007;Otto-Bliesner et al 2009;Tao et al 2013;Dail and Wunsch 2014, hereafter DW14) illustrate a gap in our knowledge of Earth's climate during that time period. Here we present a global ocean state estimate at the LGM, a dynamically consistent fit of an ocean general circulation model (OGCM) to surface ocean temperature proxies achieved Denotes content that is immediately available upon publication as open access.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%