2012
DOI: 10.1118/1.4748506
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laser speckle contrast imaging: Multifractal analysis of data recorded in healthy subjects

Abstract: Single pixels from laser speckle contrast images may not possess the same multifractal properties as LDF signals. These findings could now be compared with the ones obtained with other ranges of scales and with data recorded from pathological subjects.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
13
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
3
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This means that, when the ROI size increases and when LSCI pixel values are averaged in ROI and followed with time, the patterns of the resulting time series approach the patterns of LDF signals. These results are in accordance with other studies where it has been reported, via other signal processing methods, that LSCI pattern becomes close to the one of LDF data for ROI large enough [47], [49], [50]. However, from our results, this is not the case when recordings are performed during a vascular occlusion (see Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This means that, when the ROI size increases and when LSCI pixel values are averaged in ROI and followed with time, the patterns of the resulting time series approach the patterns of LDF signals. These results are in accordance with other studies where it has been reported, via other signal processing methods, that LSCI pattern becomes close to the one of LDF data for ROI large enough [47], [49], [50]. However, from our results, this is not the case when recordings are performed during a vascular occlusion (see Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The average value for the distance obtained for all the subjects is then computed, for each value of ( varies between 4 and 12) and for each recording procedure (rest and biological zero). 2) Around each pixel chosen in 1), square ROI of size 3 3 pixels (1.44 mm ), 9 9 pixels (12.96 mm ), 15 [49], [50]. For each ROI, the mean of the pixel values (in ) inside the ROI is computed and followed on each image of the sequence to obtain a time-evolution signal.…”
Section: Linguistic Analysis and Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that, for scale factors larger than three, LDF signals complexity becomes closer to the ones of LSCI time series with the largest ROI size. These results are in accordance with previous works where it has been reported that: (i) there are different dynamical patterns for LSCI and LDF data [26]; (ii) when the ROI size increases in LSCI data and when LSCI pixel values are averaged in ROI and followed with time, the patterns of the resulting time series approach the patterns of LDF signals [26,31,32,38]. Several studies have been carried on compression entropy [34,37,[39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The global decreasing trend observed for LSCI time series computed from the smallest ROI sizes are in accordance with other works, where it has been reported that LSCI single pixels (or small ROI sizes) in time have statistical properties similar to those of white noise [31,32]. It has also been reported that, for larger ROI sizes on LSCI data, the signal-to-noise ratio increases and the behavior asymptotically approaches the one of LDF [31,32]. Our findings are therefore consistent with these previous results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation