2000
DOI: 10.1021/jp001095u
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laser-Induced Dissociation of an Energetic Polymer:  A Spectroscopic Study of the Gaseous Products

Abstract: Previous studies of GAP (glycidyl azido polymer) laser-induced decomposition (Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics 1996, 21, 258), revealed that the shock wave produced from a diluted polymer is more energetic than from the neat polymer. In this paper, direct measurement of the energy disposal into molecular products is reported using spectroscopic methods. Chemiluminescence probes electronically excited species, and laser-induced fluorescence, ground-state radicals. It is found that the initial velocity and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] However, a few studies found that a laser ablated energetic polymer (glycidyl azide polymer [GAP]) produced a faster shock wave than nonenergetic polymers. [16][17][18][19] The increased shock wave velocity was attributed to the higher decomposition enthalpy of GAP; the pulsed laser initiated a self-sustaining exothermic reaction resulting in rapid formation of gaseous products. More recently, Roy et al 20 measured spatially and temporally resolved temperatures behind an expanding laser-induced shock wave to demonstrate differences in energy release between reacting aluminum nanoparticle formulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] However, a few studies found that a laser ablated energetic polymer (glycidyl azide polymer [GAP]) produced a faster shock wave than nonenergetic polymers. [16][17][18][19] The increased shock wave velocity was attributed to the higher decomposition enthalpy of GAP; the pulsed laser initiated a self-sustaining exothermic reaction resulting in rapid formation of gaseous products. More recently, Roy et al 20 measured spatially and temporally resolved temperatures behind an expanding laser-induced shock wave to demonstrate differences in energy release between reacting aluminum nanoparticle formulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 Besides, the composition of energetic materials can be better adjusted to improve the detonation performance by determining the compositions of the detonation products. Since the reaction time of the internal components of energetic materials during detonation is very fast, 1,3,4 it is difficult to detect the detonation products of energetic materials, and in particular the timing sequence of the products, using the conventional measurement method. The conventional methods 5 of detecting detonation products mainly include mass spectrometry (MS), 6,7 laser induced plasma spectroscopy (LIPS), 8 Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), 9 ultraviolet-visible (UV-vis) spectroscopy, 10 laser-induced uorescence (LIF) 3,11,12 and multiple methods combined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the reaction time of the internal components of energetic materials during detonation is very fast, 1,3,4 it is difficult to detect the detonation products of energetic materials, and in particular the timing sequence of the products, using the conventional measurement method. The conventional methods 5 of detecting detonation products mainly include mass spectrometry (MS), 6,7 laser induced plasma spectroscopy (LIPS), 8 Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), 9 ultraviolet-visible (UV-vis) spectroscopy, 10 laser-induced uorescence (LIF) 3,11,12 and multiple methods combined. 13,14 Generally, multiple methods are usually utilized jointly to detect more products, since a single detection method can only determine some specic products.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation